Gonzalez v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 11

REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on July 3, 2012. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 E-FILED on 7/3/12 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 SERGIO PEREZ GONZALEZ, 13 14 15 No. C-08-03916 RMW Petitioner, REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. BEN CURRY, Warden et al., Re Docket No. 5, 8, 9, 10 16 Respondent. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Under California law, a state habeas petition that has been denied by a lower court remains "pending" for the purposes of statutory tolling under AEDPA if the petitioner files a new petition in a higher court within a reasonable time. See Carey v. Saffold, 536 U.S. 214, 219-20 (2002). Where there is a delay of more than 30-60 days, a petitioner must offer an adequate explanation for the delay. See Noble v. Adams, 676 F.3d 1180, 1184 (9th Cir. 2012). Given the lack of information in petitioner's brief concerning the 116-day delay between the denial of his Superior Court petition and the filing of his petition in the California Court of Appeal, the court requests that petitioner submit a 25 supplemental brief offering evidence, if any, that his delay was reasonable. 26 If petitioner wishes to submit supplemental briefing on this issue, he must do so by August 2, 27 28 2012. Petitioner's brief is limited to 5 pages in length. If respondent wishes to file a responsive REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING—No. C-08-03916 RMW LMP 1 brief, it must do so by August 16, 2012. Any responsive brief is also limited to 5 pages in length. 2 Petitioner may not file a reply brief. 3 It is so ordered. 4 5 6 DATED: 07/03/12 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING—No. C-08-03916 RMW LMP 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?