Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
184
ORDER requiring additional filings; continuing hearing re 178 First MOTION to Amend/Correct 172 First MOTION for Attorney Fees First Interim Motion For Attorney's Fees Restated to Correct Tables filed by Susan Rene Jones, [17 2] First MOTION for Attorney Fees First Interim Motion For Attorney's Fees filed by Susan Rene Jones, 179 First MOTION for Attorney Fees NINTH CIRCUIT FEE APPLICATION TRANSFERRED filed by Susan Rene Jones. Signed by Judge James Ware on February 2, 2012. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 08-03971 JW
Susan Rene Jones,
11
ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL
FILINGS; CONTINUING HEARING
Plaintiff,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
/
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees.1 On January 3, 2012, the
16
Ninth Circuit transferred to this Court Plaintiff’s application for attorney fees in the Ninth Circuit.
17
(Docket Item No. 180.) Pursuant to that transfer, on January 8, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for
18
Ninth Circuit Attorney Fees. (See Plaintiff Jones’s Notice of Motion on Fee Application
19
Transferred from Ninth Circuit, hereafter, “January 8 Motion,” Docket Item No. 179.) In the
20
January 8 Motion, which Plaintiff noticed for February 13, 2012, Plaintiff moved the Court to “grant
21
her Attorney’s Fee Application transferred from the [Ninth Circuit],” on the basis of, inter alia, “all
22
filings, proceedings, and orders in the Ninth Circuit, any filings in this Court with respect to the
23
Ninth Circuit appeal and fee application, . . . and . . . the entire record, the accompanying
24
Memorandum, [and] the accompanying Declarations and Exhibits.” (Id. at 1-2.) However, Plaintiff
25
26
27
28
1
(Plaintiff Jones’s Restated Notice of Motion and First Interim Motion for Attorney Fees,
hereafter, “Motion,” Docket Item No. 178.) This Motion is duplicative of an earlier-filed Motion for
Attorney Fees, which Plaintiff filed on December 14, 2011. (See Plaintiff Jones’s First Interim
Motion for Attorney Fees, hereafter, “December 14 Motion,” Docket Item No. 172.) Accordingly,
the Court DENIES as moot the duplicative December 14 Motion.
1
attached none of these papers to her January 8 Motion. Nor has Plaintiff, or any party, filed any of
2
these papers with the Court, frustrating the Court’s efforts at evaluating this Motion.
3
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file, as a separate docket item, her Attorney Fee
4
Application from the Ninth Circuit, along with all the accompanying documents referred to in
5
Plaintiff’s January 8 Motion. In order to provide the Court sufficient time to evaluate these
6
materials, the Court CONTINUES the hearing on both Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and
7
Plaintiff’s Motion for Ninth Circuit Attorney Fees to February 27, 2012 at 9 a.m.
8
9
Dated: February 2, 2012
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2
Erin A. Cornell erin.cornell@sedgwicklaw.com
Rebecca A. Hull rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com
Robert Burton Nichols nichols@nicholslawgroup.com
3
4
Dated: February 2, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By:
/s/ JW Chambers
Susan Imbriani
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?