Silicon Labs Integration, Inc.

Filing 276

STIPULATION AND ORDER 275 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Counterclaimants Counterclaim, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/15/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

1
2
3
4

SHELLA DEEN -- BAR NO. 149735
HELEN S. RAKOVE -- BAR NO. 104803
HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC.
Sixty South Market Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, California 95113-2396
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

*E-FILED - 4/15/11*

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC.,
a California corporation (formerly known
as Integration Associates Incorporated)
CHARLES B. MANUEL, JR. – NEW YORK BAR NO. 1016237
Manuel & Associates
One Penn Plaza, Suite 2527
New York, New York 10119
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
(admitted pro hac vice)

12
13
14
15
16
17

RICHARD B. VAUGHT – BAR NO. 112155
Law Offices of Richard B. Vaught
111 West St. John Street, Suite 500
San Jose, CA 95113
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
SHMUEL MELMAN

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC.,
a California corporation (formerly
known as Integration Associates
Incorporated),

23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff,

No. C-08-04030-RMW
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
COUNTERCLAIMANTS COUNTERCLAIM

vs.
SHMUEL MELMAN, an individual,
Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

28
-1STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS COUNTERCLAIM
\\HFJAFS\NDrive\82174\Ple\734260.doc

1

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Silicon Labs Integration, Inc. (hereinafter referred to

2

as “Plaintiff”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Shmuel Melman (hereinafter to referred

3

to as “Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby make this Stipulated

4

Request to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Document #51) and Defendant’s

5

Counterclaim (Document # 93).

6

Plaintiff and Defendant have entered into a confidential settlement and have agreed

7

that Plaintiff will dismiss its Amended Complaint and that Defendant will dismiss his

8

Counterclaim.

9
10

This action will be dismissed in its entirety for all causes of action and against all
parties, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.

11

The case management conference set for May 20, 2011 will be vacated.

12

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

13
14

DATED: April 7, 2011

/s/
SHELLA DEEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

DATED: April 7, 2011

/s/
RICHARD B. VAUGHT
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant

15
16
17
18
19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

DATED:

4/15/11
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS COUNTERCLAIM
\\HFJAFS\NDrive\82174\Ple\734260.doc