Silicon Labs Integration, Inc.

Filing 79

STIPULATION AND ORDER 78 to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/9/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
EAST PALO A L T O

JENNIFER A. LLOYD (TX No. 24013050) [e-mail] (admitted pro hac vice) DLA PIPER LLP (US) 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500 Austin, Texas 78701 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC., a California corporation (formerly known as Integration Associates Incorporated) CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (Bar No. CA 164751) [e-mail] AMANDA M. KNUDSEN (Bar No. CA 252752) [e-mail] MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant SHMUEL MELMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

*E-FILED - 2/11/10*

SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC., a California corporation (formerly known as Integration Associates Incorporated), Plaintiff, v. SHMUEL MELMAN, an individual, Defendant.

CASE NO. CV 08-04030-RMW STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

[N.D. Local Rules 6.2 AND 7.121]

Plaintiff Silicon Labs Integration, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff') and Defendant Shmuel Melman (hereinafter to referred to as "Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby make this Stipulated Request to modify certain dates in the Scheduling Order entered in this matter on August 12, 2009 (Docket # 55). -1WEST\21867159.1

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. CV-08-04030-RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
EAST PALO A L T O

As set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Jennifer A. Lloyd, the parties have made no prior requests for any modifications to the Scheduling Order in effect in the case. Counsel for the parties are requesting that discovery be extended an additional 60 days. The parties have conducted written discovery and exchanged documents, and have conferred regarding oral depositions. However, Defendant Melman's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Claim for Relief (Docket # 57) is still under submission before the Court, and thus Defendant Melman has not yet filed his answer or any potential counterclaims. Thus, the parties seek to extend the discovery deadline for a period of 60 days from the original date of February 1, 2010 to a proposed deadline of April 2, 2010. Additionally, the parties seek to extend the following deadlines: The parties have agreed to ADR Local Rule 3-4(b) to conduct a private mediation before a single neutral mediator acceptable to both parties with the cost of the mediation to be borne equally by the parties. The parties have agreed to extend this deadline from the original date of 120 days after the date of the Scheduling Order filed on August 12, 2009 to April 2, 2010. The parties have agreed to extend the deadline to make their initial disclosures of testifying experts and serve on all other parties the materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) from the original date of February 26, 2010 to April 27, 2010. The parties have agreed to extend the deadline to make their disclosures of rebuttal testifying experts and serve on all other parties the materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) from the original date of March 31, 2010 to May 18, 2010. The parties have agreed to extend the deadline to complete expert witness discovery from the original date of April 16, 2010 to May 31, 2010 The deadlines for final pretrial conference of June 3, 2010 and trial on June 21, 2010 are unaffected. This Stipulation is without prejudice to the parties' right to seek further modification of the Scheduling Order.

-2WEST\21867159.1

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. CV-08-04030-RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
EAST PALO A L T O

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: January 29, 2010 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP By: /s/ Christopher L. Wanger Christopher L. Wanger Attorneys for Defendant, SHMUEL MELMAN Dated: January 29, 2010 DLA PIPER LLP (US) By: /s/ Jennifer A. Lloyd Jennifer A. Lloyd Attorneys for Plaintiff, SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2/9 Dated: _____________, 2010 __________________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge

-3WEST\21867159.1

STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. CV-08-04030-RMW