Silicon Labs Integration, Inc.

Filing 94

STIPULATION AND ORDER 91 to Modify Scheduling Order: Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/21/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SHELLA DEEN -- BAR NO. 149735 HELEN S. RAKOVE -- BAR NO. 104803 HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC. Sixty South Market Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, California 95113-2396 Phone: (408) 287-9501 Fax: (408) 287-2583 Attorneys for Plaintiff SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC., a California corporation (formerly known as Integration Associates Incorporated) CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER ­ BAR NO. 164751 AMANDA M. KNUDSEN ­ BAR NO. 252752 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 291-7400 Fax: (415) 291-7474 Attorneys for Defendant SHMUEL MELMAN *E-FILED - 4/23/10* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC., a California corporation (formerly known as Integration Associates Incorporated), Plaintiff, vs. SHMUEL MELMAN, an individual, Defendant. Plaintiff Silicon Labs Integration, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff') and Defendant Shmuel Melman (hereinafter to referred to as "Defendant"), by and through their -1STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER \\HFJAFS\NDrive\82174\Ple\560317.doc No. C08-04030 STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER [NORTHERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULES 6.2 AND 7.12] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 respective counsel, hereby make this Stipulated Request to modify certain dates in the Scheduling Orders entered in this matter on August 12, 2009 (Docket # 55) and February 9, 2010 (Docket # 79) due to Defendant's medical condition as set forth in the accompanying declaration of Christopher L. Wanger. Defendant has represented that Mr. Melman has a medical condition which has prevented his deposition taking place, prevented Mr. Melman from further responding to discovery and participating in a mediation. Counsel for the parties are requesting that all pre-trial deadlines be extended an additional 30 days. The parties have conducted written discovery and exchanged documents, and have conferred regarding oral depositions. However, Defendant Melman's medical condition is still uncertain, and Melman's counsel anticipates that his prognosis will be ascertained shortly. Thus, the parties seek to extend the forthcoming pre-trial deadlines for a period of 30 days as follows: Discovery deadline for a further period of 30 days to May 3, 2010. The parties have agreed to ADR Local Rule 3-4(b) to conduct a private mediation before a single neutral mediator acceptable to both parties with the cost of the mediation to be borne equally by the parties. The parties have agreed to extend this deadline from April 2, 2010 to May 3, 2010. The filing date for dispositive motions shall be May 3, 2010. The parties have agreed to extend the deadline to make their initial disclosures of testifying experts and serve on all other parties the materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) from April 27, 2010 to May 24, 2010. The parties have agreed to extend the deadline to make their disclosures of rebuttal testifying experts and serve on all other parties the materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) from May 18, 2010 to May 31, 2010. The parties have agreed to extend the deadline to complete expert witness discovery from May 31, 2010 to June 4, 2010. -2STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER \\HFJAFS\NDrive\82174\Ple\560317.doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The hearing date for dispositive motions shall be June 11, 2010. The court vacates the final pretrial conference and trial dates and will reschedule the pretrial conference and trial on June 11, 2010. This Stipulation is without prejudice to the parties' right to seek further modification of the Scheduling Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: April 15, 2010 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP By: /s/ Christopher L. Wanger Christopher L. Wanger Attorneys for Defendant, SHMUEL MELMAN Dated: April 15, 2010 HOGE FENTON JONES & APPEL, Inc. By: /s/ Shella Deen Shella Deen Attorneys for Plaintiff, SILICON LABS INTEGRATION, INC. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2010 __________________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge -3STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER \\HFJAFS\NDrive\82174\Ple\560317.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?