eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 15

Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge by eBay Inc. (Eberhart, David) (Filed on 9/3/2008) Text modified on 9/4/2008 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc. et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474) SHARON M. BUNZEL (S.B. #181609) COLLEEN M. KENNEDY (S.B. #227107) ckennedy@omm.com sbunzel@omm.com deberhart@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff eBay Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION EBAY INC., Plaintiff, v. DIGITAL POINT SOLUTIONS, INC., SHAWN HOGAN, KESSLER'S FLYING CIRCUS, THUNDERWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., TODD DUNNING, BRIAN DUNNING, BRIANDUNNING.COM, and DOES 120, Defendants. Case No. C 08-4052 (PVT) DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO DIST JUDGE - C 08-4052 (PVT) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The undersigned party hereby respectfully declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Court Judge pursuant to Local Rule 73-1(a)(1). Dated: September 3, 2008 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ David R. Eberhart David R. Eberhart, Esq. Sharon M. Bunzel, Esq. Colleen M. Kennedy, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff eBAY INC. SF1:726201.1 2 DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO DIST JUDGE - C 08-4052 (PVT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?