eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 49

Reply to Opposition re 37 MOTION to Dismiss KFC's Joinder filed byKessler's Flying Circus. (McClellan, Patrick) (Filed on 11/27/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK K. McCLELLAN Patrick K. McClellan #077352 pkellymc@pacbell.net 2211 Michelson Drive, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone (949)261-7615 Facsimile (949)851-2772 Attorney for Defendant KESSLER'S FLYING CIRCUS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION EBAY INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DIGITAL POINTS SOLUTIONS, INC., ) SHAWN HOGAN; KESSLER'S FLYING ) CIRCUS; THUNDERWOOD HOLDINGS, ) INC.; TODD DUNNING; DUNNING ) ENTERPRISES, INC.; BRIAN DUNNING; ) BRIANDUNNING.COM; and DOES 1-20, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________ ) Case No. 08-4052 KESSLER'S FLYING CIRCUS' JOINDER IN THE REPLY BRIEF OF TODD DUNNING AND DUNNING ENTERPRISES, INC., AND THE REPLY OF THUNDERWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., BRIAN DUNNING AND BRIANDUNNING.COM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: December 12, 2008 Time: 9:00 a.m. Ctrm: 3 - Hon. Jeremy Fogel presiding TO THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Kessler's Flying Circus ("KFC") does hereby join with and adopt the arguments set forth in the Reply Brief of Todd Dunning and Dunning Enterprises, Inc, and the Reply by Defendants /// /// 1 KESSLER'S FLYING CIRCUS' JOINDER 1 2 3 Thunderwood Holdings, Inc., Brian Dunning and Briandunning.com to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed herein. DATED: NOVEMBER 26, 2008 LAW OFFICE OF PATRICK K. McCLELLAN BY: /s/ PATRICK K. McCLELLAN PATRICK K. Mc CLELLAN Attorney for Defendant Kessler's Flying Circus 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 KESSLER'S FLYING CIRCUS' JOINDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?