Nakash v. Nvidia Corporation

Filing 173

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT to Extend Time to File Motion for Class Certification and Continue Hearing re 171 Stipulation filed by Nvidia Corporation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 168 MOTION to Dismiss COUNTS II, III AND VI OF PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Motion Hearing set for 6/14/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/8/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA CORPORATION ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C 08-04312 JW The NVIDIA GPU Litigation _____________________________________ This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE OHS West:260842861.1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE C 08-04312 JW LI 3/8/2010 ROBERT P. VARIAN (STATE BAR NO. 107459) rvarian@orrick.com JAMES N. KRAMER (STATE BAR NO. 154709) jkramer@orrick.com JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN (STATE BAR NO. 225734) jlichterman@orrick.com JOSHUA D. WATTS (STATE BAR NO. 240977) jwatts@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: +1-415-773-5700 Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA FO m Judge Ja es Ware R NIA ED ORDER T IS SO DIFIED I AS MO RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By order dated December 18, 2009, this Court set a hearing date of April 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. for Plaintiffs' anticipated Motion for Class Certification and directed the parties to complete all briefing on the motion by April 5, 2010. The parties currently are engaged in active mediation efforts with the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (Ret.) as part of an effort to resolve this action, and believe that they are making progress toward a near-term resolution of the lawsuit. To date the parties have participated in three mediation sessions with Judge Philips. The first mediation session occurred on December 16, 2009 and involved not only the parties to the action, but also NVIDIA Corporation's ("NVIDIA's") insurers. After the initial mediation session, the parties continued their settlement discussions and updated Judge Phillips regarding the status of the negotiations during a telephonic mediation follow-up call on January 8, 2010. The third mediation session, which again involved NVIDIA's insurers as well as the parties, occurred recently on February 5, 2010 and was a daylong mediation session. Following the February 5, 2010 mediation session, the parties continue to actively pursue settlement of the class claims based on Judge Phillips' observation that litigation costs would be minimized, and the interests of all parties would be best served, by the parties continuing their settlement discussions. At the conclusion of the most recent mediation session, NVIDIA advised Plaintiffs that it needed to consult with several of the original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") concerning a number of issues raised during the mediation, and that NVIDIA believed that the parties may potentially be able to avoid litigating a number of issues if NVIDIA were permitted a brief period of time to consult with the OEMs. The parties agree that the mediation process will likely be aided by NVIDIA being permitted a brief period of time to do so. In addition, the parties anticipate the need for additional discovery, including depositions of the five individual plaintiffs, depositions of NVIDIA and representatives of the primary OEMs, and possible designation of expert witnesses. As a result of the foregoing, the parties are in agreement that the current schedule concerning briefing related to class certification should be modified. Extending the date for completion of class certification briefing to June 7, 2010 and continuing the hearing to June 28, OHS West:260842861.1 -1- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE C 08-04312 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2010 at 9:00 a.m. will allow the parties the additional time necessary to conduct discovery on class certification issues and to advance potential resolution of the case through the ongoing mediation without having to incur potentially unnecessary and avoidable investment of time and expense that neither benefits the putative class, the defendant, or the Court. Currently, a Preliminary Pretrial Conference in this action is calendared for June 14, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. with Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statements due June 4, 2010, however, in light of the ongoing settlement efforts by the parties, the parties respectfully request that the Court change the Preliminary Pretrial Conference to a Case Management Conference and adopt the briefing schedule proposed below. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and NVIDIA, through their counsel of record and Interim Lead Class Counsel for Plaintiffs, that: 1. 2010; 2. The current April 5, 2010 deadline for completion of briefing for class certification All briefing on the motion for class certification shall be completed by Muy e 7, J an 24, shall be vacated; 3. The hearing date for the motion for class certification currently set for April 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. shall be vacated and a new hearing date for the motion for class certification June 28 201 shall be scheduled for June 14, ,2010 0 at 9:00 a.m., or a date thereafter convenient to the Court; and 4. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently set for June 14, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. shall be changed to a Case Management Conference and the Case Management Conference Statements will be filed by the parties, in lieu of Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statements, on June 4, 2010. 5. Nvidia's Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III, VI of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Docket Item No. 168) is also continued from April 26, 2010 to June 14, 2010 at 9:00 AM in accordance with the modified briefing schedule above. OHS West:260842861.1 -2- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE C 08-04312 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 12, 2010 ROBERT P. VARIAN JAMES N. KRAMER JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN JOSHUA D. WATTS Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP /s/ Joshua D. Watts JOSHUA D. WATTS Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA CORPORATION Dated: February 12, 2010 JEFF S. WESTERMAN SABRINA S. KIM NICOLE M. DUCKETT Milberg LLP /s/ Jeff S. Westerman JEFF S. WESTERMAN Interim Lead Class Counsel for Plaintiffs and All Others Similarly Situated The filer attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, or from the single signatory (in the case, e.g., of a declaration) which shall serve in lieu of their signature(s) on the document. IT IS SO ORDERED:AS MODIFED. M ____ ___ DATE:____arch 8,_2010______________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE OHS West:260842861.1 -3- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE C 08-04312 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OHS West:260842861.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 12, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 12, 2010. /s/ Joshua D. Watts Joshua D. Watts -4- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE C 08-04312 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?