Nakash v. Nvidia Corporation
Filing
6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO SAN JOSE DIVISION PURSUANT TO STIPULATION re 3 Stipulation filed by Nvidia Corporation. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/27/2008. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2008)
Case 3:08-cv-04312-MEJ
Document 3
Filed 10/21/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ROBERT P. VARIAN (STATE BAR NO. 107459) rvarian@orrick.com JAMES N. KRAMER (STATE BAR NO. 154709) jkramer@orrick.com JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN (STATE BAR NO. 225734) jlichterman@orrick.com JOSHUA D. WATTS (STATE BAR NO. 240977) jwatts@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: +1-415-773-5700 Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759 Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
STEVEN NAKASH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant.
Case No. C-08-4312 MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INTRADISTRICT REASSIGNMENT TO THE SAN JOSE DIVISION [CIV. L.R. 3-2]
OHS West:260530143.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INTRADISTRICT RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THE SAN JOSE DIVISION C-08-4312 MEJ
Case 3:08-cv-04312-MEJ
Document 3
Filed 10/21/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Steven Nakash, individually and on behalf of an alleged class, filed this action against nVidia Corporation ("NVIDIA") on September 12, 2008 in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, alleging claims related to certain computer chips sold by NVIDIA; WHEREAS, NVIDIA maintains its corporate headquarters and principal place of business at 2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, California, 95050; WHEREAS, Civ. L.R. 3-2(e) provides that "all civil actions which arise in the counties of Santa Clara ... shall be assigned to the San Jose Division"; WHEREAS, the parties agree that this matter should be assigned to the San Jose Division pursuant to L.R. 3-2(e); WHEREAS, there are currently other actions pending in the San Jose Division that involve some or all of the same parties, and appear to arise out of the same essential facts and circumstances, and transfer of this action to the San Jose Division would facilitate coordination and/or consolidation of this action with such other actions; and WHEREAS, the Court may transfer this action to the San Jose Division pursuant to Civ. L.R. 3-2(f). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel, that this action be transferred forthwith to the San Jose Division.
Dated: October 21, 2008
ROBERT P. VARIAN JAMES N. KRAMER JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN JOSHUA D. WATTS Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
/s/ Robert P. Varian ROBERT P. VARIAN Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA CORPORATION
OHS West:260530143.1
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INTRADISTRICT RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THE SAN JOSE DIVISION C-08-4312 MEJ
Case 3:08-cv-04312-MEJ
Document 3
Filed 10/21/2008
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: October 21, 2008
PAUL R. KIESEL (STATE BAR NO. 119854) Kiesel Boucher Larson LLP
/s/ Paul R. Kiesel PAUL R. KIESEL Attorneys for Plaintiffs
The filer shall attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, or from the single signatory (in the case, e.g., of a declaration) which shall serve in lieu of their signature(s) on the document.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: October _____, 2008
Honorable Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge
OHS West:260530143.1
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INTRADISTRICT RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THE SAN JOSE DIVISION C-08-4312 MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?