Inicom Networks, Inc. v. Nividia Corporation et al

Filing 50

RELATED CASE ORDER. Related cases: Create association to 5:08-cv-05081-HRL. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/16/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W PHILADELPHIA

UNIT ED

ROBERT A. PARTICELLI (PAB 82651) (Pro Hac Vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 215.963.5001 E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

ER

N

C F D IS T IC T O R 1/16/2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INICOM NETWORKS, INC., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,, Plaint iff, vs. NVIDIA CORP., et al., Defendants. This Document Relates To: Waidzunas, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard, Co., Case No. 08-cv-05081-HRL

Case No. 08-cv-04332-JW STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

28
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED (08-cv-04332-JW)

A

LI

FO

m Judge Ja

es Ware

R NIA

HOWARD HOLDERNESS (SBN 169814) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.442.1001 E-mail: [e-mail]

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

GRAN

TED

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W PHILADELPHIA

WHEREAS, several cases are currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that concern substantially the same parties, underlying facts and allegations as the above-captioned matter; WHEREAS, at least seven (7) of these other federal cases have been marked related to one another pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(b), including the above-captioned matter by Order dated December 30, 2008 (See Docket No. 44); WHEREAS, another case, Waidzunas, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 08-cv-05081-HRL ("Waidzunas"), was filed after the above-captioned matter and also concerns substantially the same parties, underlying facts and allegations as the above-captioned matter; WHEREAS, if not likewise deemed related and reassigned to the Judge presiding over this and the other already-related cases, Waidzunas will likely create unduly burdensome and duplicative labor and expense and/or conflicting results; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Waidzunas Plaintiffs and HP, through their designated counsel of record, that Waidzunas v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 08cv-05081-HRL, should be marked related to the above-captioned matter pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3.12(b).

28
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED (08-cv-04332-JW)

2

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W PHILADELPHIA

Dated: January 9, 2009

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP /s/ Robert A. Particelli ROBERT A. PARTICELLI, ESQUIRE Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Dated: January 9, 2009

SEEGER WEISS LLP /s/ Jonathan Shub JONATHAN SHUB, ESQUIRE Attorneys for Plaintiffs LANCE WAIDZUNAS, BRENT WEST, MICHAEL MANN, TYLER BURGERT, CHI LOK LEUNG, AND BRIAN ROBINSON

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: This order also terminated Docket Item No. 45.in C 08-04332 JW January 16, 2009 DATE: ________________________ _____________________________________ THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED (08-cv-04332-JW)

3

3