Branner v. East Palo Alto Police Department et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/14/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
William Branner,

Plaintiff(s), v.
East Palo Alto Police Department, et al.

STIPULATION AND ----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the fol.lowing stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) J Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may notJile thisform. They must insteadfle a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

1 Private Process:
Private ADR (please identzfiprocess and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
?
\

other requested deadline
I

?

Dated: 1/9/2009 Dated:

,

:

~ t t o p & Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (Em) V Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order. other IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/14/09 UNITED STATES------------------- JUDGE MAGISTRATE DISTRICT