Pedraza et al v. Borg

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 DISMISSING CASE. Case dismissed with prejudice. Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/17/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 South First Street, Suite 708 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: (408) 292-1040 Fax: (408) 416-0248 waqw@sbcglobal.net Attorney for Plaintiffs *E-FILED 05-17-2010* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SALINAS, ET AL Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.: 08-04710 HRL STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE & XXXXXXXX ORDER [PROPOSED] THEREON SELEX INC., ET AL Defendants Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Parties have reached a settlement with respect to all claims of all Plaintiffs against all Defendants in this case. 2. As such, parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action in its entirety with prejudice. 3. The Parties stipulate that this Court should retain its jurisdiction over this case for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement. 1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Salinas, et al. v. Selex Inc., et al. 08-04710 HRL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Dated: May 14, 2010 By: /s/ Adam Pedersen____ ADAM PEDERSEN Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: May 14, 2010 By: ____/s/Scott Lewis_____ SCOTT LEWIS Attorney for Defendants ______________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] XXXXXXXX ORDER Pursuant to party's stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. May 17, 2010 Dated: ================ January _____, 2008 _________________________ Hon. Howard Lloyd United States District Court Magistrate 2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Salinas, et al. v. Selex Inc., et al. 08-04710 HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?