Hiraide v. Vast Systems Technology Corporation et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER 39 Selecting ADR Process. Private ADR. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/20/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2009)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Hiraide, Ryuichi

Clear Form

*E-FILED - 4/20/09*
CASE NO. C08-04714 RMW Plaintiff(s), v.
VaST Systems Technology Corporation, et al.

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
The Parties have agreed to a private mediator. A provider will be decided at a later date.

_____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________

4/ _____ Dated:__16/2009____

Der _________ ___ek G. Howard________________ Attorney for Plaintiff Dhaivat H. Shah ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant

4/ _____ Dated:__16/2009_____

E When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket vent, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 9 other ___________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4/ _ / __ Dated:__20_09 __________

___________________________________ Ronald M. Whyte UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE