Greenlaw v. Adams et al
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference and Hearing on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Whyte on 08/25/09. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties have stipulated to continue the hearing on Gage's motion to dismiss and the Case Management Conference, both currently set for August 28, 2009. The hearing and case management conference are hereby vacated. Absent a written stipulation otherwise, the hearing on Gage's motion to dismiss and the case management conference will be held on November 6, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., respectively. The attempt at service on Tower Adams by certified mail return receipt requested was returned unconfirmed. Plaintiff is to verify the address of defendant Tower Adams if she wishes to pursue the case against him. The court does not intend to continue the hearing and Case Management Conference again. The opposition and reply shall be due according to the new date. v. TOWER ADAMS and DAVID GAGE, Defendants. ROSEMARY GREENLAW Plaintiff, No. C-08-04782 - RMW ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS [Re Docket No. 36] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 8/25/09
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Notice of this document has been sent to: Plaintiff, pro se: Rosemary Greenlaw 825 Villa Avenue San Jose, CA 95126-2461 Counsel for Defendants: Edward F. Cullen email@example.com
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
JAS Chambers of Judge Whyte
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?