Walsh v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 252

2
3
4

5
6 7
8

Robert A. M i t t e l s t a e d t ( S B N 0 6 0 3 5 9 ) J a s o n M c D o n e l l (SBN 1 1 5 0 8 4 ) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES D A Y 555 California Street, 2 6th F l o o r S a n Francisco, C A 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] T h a r a n G r e g o r y L a n i e r ( S B N 138784) J a n e L. Froyd ( S B N 220776) JONES DAY 1755 E m b a r c a d e r o Road P a l o Alto, C A 94303 Telephone: (650) 7 3 9 - 3 9 3 9 Facsimile: [phone]

9
10

[e-mail]
1I
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

j [e-mail]
S c o t t W. C o w a n ( A d m i t t e d Pro Hac Vice) J o s h u a L. Fuchs ( A d m i t t e d Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 7 I 7 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, T X 77002 Telephone: (832) 2 3 9 - 3 9 3 9 Facsimile: (832) 2 3 9 - 3 6 0 0 [e-mail] [e-mail] A t t o r n e y s for D e f e n d a n t s S A P A G , S A P A M E R l C A , INC., a n d T O M O R R O W N O W , INC. UNITED STATES D I S T R l C T C O U R T NORTHERN DISTRlCT OF CALIFORNIA SAN F R A N C I S C O DIVISION O R A C L E U S A , INC., et aI., Case No. 0 7 - C Y - 1 6 5 8 P I H ( E D L ) D E C L A R A T I O N O F A L B E R T YA N W1SSEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL Date: N / A T i m e : N/A Courtroom: E, 15 th F l o o r Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

22
23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiffs,

v.
S A P A G , et a!., Defendants.

A. VAN wrSSEN DECLARATION Case No. 0 7 . ( ; V - 1 6 5 8 I ' J H (EDL)

Do

I, ALBERT VAN WISSEN, declare:
2 3 4 5 S i n c e J u n e 1 , 2 0 0 6 , I h a v e b e e n t h e C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r ( " C F O " ) o f TomolTowNow, Inc. ("TN"), one o f the Defendants in this case and a subsidiary o f SAP America, Inc., which is a s u b s i d i a r y o f S A P A G ( c o l l e c t i v e l y " S A P " ) . I m a k e this d e c l a r a t i o n b a s e d o n p e r s o n a l k n o w l e d g e a n d , i f c a l l e d upon t o d o s o , c o u l d t e s t i f y c o m p e t e n t l y t h e r e t o . 1. Prior to the present litigation, I a m aware that TN considered providing third party

6
7 8 9 10

support for the Hyperion and eBusiness Suite ("EBS") software product lines. T N ' s consideration o f servicing Hyperion and EBS products involved, among other things, an analysis o f the projected revenues, expenses and other logistics associated with those potential new service offerings.

II
12 13 14 15 16 17
18
19

2.

Ultimately, TN did not provide third party support for Hyperion and EBS

products. To my knowledge, while I have been CFO, TN has never received any revenue for providing such support services, it never incur any expenses related to Hyperion and EBS products, and it never received revenue or inculTed expenses related to Retek products. . 1 declare under penalty o f peJjury under the laws o f the United States and the State o f California that the foregoing is true and cOlTect. Executed this 23rd da o f January, 2009 in Amsterdam, T h e Netherlands.

ALBERT VAN WISSEN 20 21

22
23
24

25 26 27
28
2
A V A N WISSEN D E C L A R A T I O N Cao;e No. 0 7 - e V - 1 6 5 8 P1H ( E D L )