Gomelsky v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 30

AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Apple, Inc.. Filed byGiorgio Gomelsky. (Attachments: # 1 FIRST AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS)(Crowther, Robyn) (Filed on 4/2/2009)

Download PDF
1 MEISELMAN, DENLEA, PACKMAN, 2 Jeffrey I. Carton (pro hac vice) 3 Jerome Noll (pro hac vice) 4 Christine M. Ford (pro hac vice application to be submitted) 5 1311 Mamaroneck Avenue CARTON & EBERZ P.C. jnoll@mdpcelaw.com jcarton@mdpcelaw.com cford@mdpcelaw.com 6 Telephone: (914) 517-5000 7 White Plains, New York 10605 Facsimile: (914) 517-5055 8 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC 9 crowther@caldwell-leslie.com 10 giang@caldwell-leslie.com ROBYN C. CROWTHER, SBN 193840 ALBERT GIANG, SBN 224332 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 600 Telephone: (213) 629-9040 11 Los Angeles, California 90017-2463 12 Facsimile: (213) 629-9022 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 16 and all others similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REUBEN BERENBLAT, ANDREW LAURA MILLER, On behalf of Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 17 PERSONETTE, EARL C. SIMPSON, 18 themselves and all others similarly situated, CERTIFICATION OF 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR FIRST AMENDED INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS APPLE INC., Defendants. -1FIRST AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS 1 2 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other 3 than the named parties, there is no such interest to report. 4 5 DATED: April 2, 2009 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR Respectfully submitted, CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC ROBYN C. CROWTHER ALBERT GIANG By /s/ ROBYN C. CROWTHER Attorneys for Plaintiffs -2FIRST AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?