Gomelsky v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 80

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Extending Plaintiffs' Time to File Third Amended Complaint by Reuben Berenblat, Laura Miller, Andrew Personette, Earl Simpson. (Crowther, Robyn) (Filed on 5/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MEISELMAN, DENLEA, PACKMAN, CARTON & EBERZ P.C. JEFFREY I. CARTON (pro hac vice) [e-mail] MICHAEL A. BERG (pro hac vice) [e-mail] 1311 Mamaroneck Avenue White Plains, New York 10605 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC ROBYN C. CROWTHER, State Bar No. 193840 [e-mail] ERIC S. PETTIT, State Bar No. 234657 [e-mail] 1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600 Los Angeles, California 90017-2463 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Berenblatt, Personette, Simpson, Miller and all others similarly situated
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION REUBEN BERENBLATT, ANDREW PERSONETTE, EARL C. SIMPSON, LAURA MILLER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant. THOMAS WAGNER, SCOTT MEYERS, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. C-08--04969 JF Case No. C-09--01649 JF

Case No. Case No.

C-08-04969 JF (PVT) C-09-01649 JF (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint ("Second Amended Complaint") on September 21, 2009; WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, Defendant's deadline to respond to the Second Amended Complaint was extended from October 5, 2009 to November 5, 2009; WHEREAS, Defendant moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on November 5, 2009; WHEREAS, the Court granted Defendant's motion, with leave to amend as to Plaintiffs' claims under the UCL and for unjust enrichment, on April 7, 2010; WHEREAS, the Court's April 7, 2010 Order ("Order") required Plaintiffs to file any amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of the Order (i.e. May 7, 2010); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Administrative Relief pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 on April 22, 2010, seeking leave to conduct targeted discovery prior to filing an amended complaint; WHEREAS, Defendant filed an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief on April 26, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the current deadline for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint until May 28, 2010; WHEREAS, the continuance of the deadline to file an amended complaint will not affect any other deadlines in this action;
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. C-08--04969 JF Case No. C-09--01649 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT: 1. Plaintiffs' deadline to file an amended complaint is extended until May 28, 2010. Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, PC By: Dated: May 5, 2010 /s/ Robyn C. Crowther Robyn C. Crowther

Dated: May 5, 2010

Girard Gibbs, LLP

By: Dated: May 5, 2010

/s/ Eric H. Gibbs Eric H. Gibbs

Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC

By:

/s/ Douglas J. McNamara Douglas J. McNamara Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 5, 2009

Morrison & Foerster LLP By: /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach Andrew D. Muhlbach Attorneys for Defendant

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45.1, I, Robyn C. Crowther attest that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories. PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May__, 2010 _________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel
United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No. C-08--04969 JF Case No. C-09--01649 JF