Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al

Filing 1054

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 941 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS filed by Research In Motion Corporation, Research in Motion Limited. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on July 31, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)

Download PDF
R NIA FO UNIT ED S 4 LI Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW E R N A MFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, H 3 re mes Wa Judge Ja RT 2 NO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ERED O ORD IT IS S RT U O 1 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T F D IS T IC T O R C Jury Trial Demanded 5 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, 6 v. 7 8 9 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, a Canadian corporation AND RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 11 12 Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs. 13 14 The Court hereby orders that the exhibits designated “JOINT” on Exhibit A to the parties’ 15 stipulation are admitted into evidence at trial. Any such exhibit may be treated at trial as described 16 in paragraph 9 of the Court’s Final Pretrial Order. The Court hereby orders that the exhibits to 17 which objections have not been identified on Exhibit A to the parties’ stipulation are admissible at 18 trial. Any such exhibit may be treated at trial as described in paragraph 9 of the Court’s Final 19 Pretrial Order, but will not be provided to the jury unless actually used by a party at trial. The Court 20 further orders the parties to comply with the stipulated procedures set forth in paragraph 5 of the 21 parties’ joint stipulation. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: July 31, 2012 24 HONORABLE JAMES WARE United States District Court Judge 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order 4820-6708-0975.2 Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?