Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al

Filing 116

ORDER AMENDING 106 Order on Motion to Seal re 115 Proposed Order. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/16/209. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Linda S. DeBruin (Admitted to this Court on September 27,1991) Aaron D. Charfoos (pro hac vice) Maria A. Maras (pro hac vice) Meredith Zinanni (pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: (312) 862-2000 Facsimile: (312) 862-2200 Email: linda.debruin@kirkland.com Email: aaron.charfoos@kirkland.com Email: maria.maras@kirkland.com Email: meredith.zinanni@kirkland.com Marc H. Cohen (CA Bar No. 168773) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP P.O. Box 51827 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 859-7000 Facsimile: (650) 859-7500 Email: marc.cohen@kirkland.com Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, a Canadian corporation AND RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs. [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO L. R. 79-5(D) GRANTING MFORMATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF ITS REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF AND ENTIRE RELATED DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW Jury Trial Demanded [Proposed] Order Pursuant to L.R. 79-5(d) Granting Mformation's Administrative Motion to File Portions of its Reply Claim Construction Brief And Entire Related Documents Under Seal Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Pursuant to L.R. 79-5(d) Granting Mformation's Administrative Motion to File Portions of its Reply Claim Construction Brief And Entire Related Documents Under Seal ORDER In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, the Court, having considered RIM's Response to Mformation's Administrative Motion to File Portions of its Reply Claim Construction Brief and Entire Related Documents Under Seal and the Declaration of Eugene Goryunov Pursuant to L.R. 795(d) in Response to Mformation's Motion to File Documents Under Seal, including all papers and declarations filed in support of and/or in connection therewith, orders as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mformation's Motion to Seal is GRANTED and the following actions are to be taken by the Clerk: 1. The under seal and public versions of Mformation's Reply Claim Construction Brief be be filed. provided by Mformation on November 6, 2009, shall notfiled under seal. 2. The highlighted version of Mformation's Reply Claim Construction Brief attached at Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Eugene Goryunov shall be filed under seal. 3. The redacted version of Mformation's Reply Claim Construction Brief attached at Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Eugene Goryunov shall be filed in the public file. These documents shall remain sealed unless and until this Court orders otherwise. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 16 Dated: __________________, 2009 Honorable James Ware United States District Judge -2- Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?