Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al
Filing
459
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 394 defendants' Motion to Redact 386 August 3, 2010 Hearing Transcript. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)
1
2
*E-FILED 04-21-2011*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
No. C08-04990 JW (HRL)
MFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
12
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO REDACT AUGUST 3, 2010
HEARING TRANSCRIPT
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and
RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION,
[Re: Docket No. 394]
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
Defendants move to redact certain portions of the transcript of the August 3, 2010
18
motion hearings before this court. Plaintiff opposes the motion. The matter is deemed
19
appropriate for determination without oral argument. CIV. L.R. 7-1(b). Upon consideration of
20
the moving and responding papers, this court grants the motion.
21
Defendants say that the subject information quotes or summarizes certain emails that
22
they have designated “Confidential”. Indeed, as it turns out, the transcript in question pertains
23
to proceedings in which plaintiff sought (among other things) to de-designate those emails
24
entirely. As reflected in that transcript and in the subsequent order, this court found no basis for
25
defendants’ “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” designation, but nevertheless declined to de-designate the
26
emails entirely and permitted defendants to designate the information as “Confidential.” (See
27
Docket No. 275 at 3-4). This court has reviewed the pertinent portions of the August 3, 2010
28
1
hearing transcript and grants defendants’ motion to redact them.
2
3
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 21, 2011
4
HOWARD R. LLOYD
5
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:08-cv-04990-JW Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Aaron D. Charfoos
3
Amardeep Lal Thakur
4
Carl John Blickle
5
Christopher R. Liro
christopher.liro@kirkland.com
6
Cynthia Jo Franecki
cfranecki@foley.com, lvanderboom@foley.com, mlucas@foley.com
7
Eugene Goryunov
8
Gina Ann Bibby
9
Justin E. Gray
athakur@foley.com, dgrimes@foley.com
carlblickle@gmail.com
egoryunov@kirkland.com
gbibby@foley.com, mlagdameo@foley.com
jegray@foley.com, dgrimes@foley.com
Linda S. DeBruin ldebruin@kirkland.com, bridgett.ofosu@kirkland.com,
kathleen.cawley@kirkland.com, margaret.burke@kirkland.com
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
acharfoos@kirkland.com
12
Marc Howard Cohen marc.cohen@kirkland.com, frank.carlow@kirkland.com,
lesley.ahlberg@kirkland.com, mary.nguyen@kirkland.com
13
Maria A. Maras
14
Meredith Zinanni meredith.zinanni@kirkland.com, cassandra.milleville@kirkland.com,
kimberly.davenport@kirkland.com
maria.maras@kirkland.com
15
Michael Anthony Parks
mparks@kirkland.com
16
Michael Daley Karson
michael.karson@kirkland.com
17
Michael S Feldberg
michael.feldberg@allenovery.com
18
Shawn Edward McDonald
SEMcDonald@foley.com
19
Tiffany Patrice Cunningham
tiffany.cunningham@kirkland.com
20
21
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?