Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al

Filing 459

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 394 defendants' Motion to Redact 386 August 3, 2010 Hearing Transcript. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED 04-21-2011* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 No. C08-04990 JW (HRL) MFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REDACT AUGUST 3, 2010 HEARING TRANSCRIPT Plaintiff, v. 13 14 RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, [Re: Docket No. 394] 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Defendants move to redact certain portions of the transcript of the August 3, 2010 18 motion hearings before this court. Plaintiff opposes the motion. The matter is deemed 19 appropriate for determination without oral argument. CIV. L.R. 7-1(b). Upon consideration of 20 the moving and responding papers, this court grants the motion. 21 Defendants say that the subject information quotes or summarizes certain emails that 22 they have designated “Confidential”. Indeed, as it turns out, the transcript in question pertains 23 to proceedings in which plaintiff sought (among other things) to de-designate those emails 24 entirely. As reflected in that transcript and in the subsequent order, this court found no basis for 25 defendants’ “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” designation, but nevertheless declined to de-designate the 26 emails entirely and permitted defendants to designate the information as “Confidential.” (See 27 Docket No. 275 at 3-4). This court has reviewed the pertinent portions of the August 3, 2010 28 1 hearing transcript and grants defendants’ motion to redact them. 2 3 SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2011 4 HOWARD R. LLOYD 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5:08-cv-04990-JW Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Aaron D. Charfoos 3 Amardeep Lal Thakur 4 Carl John Blickle 5 Christopher R. Liro christopher.liro@kirkland.com 6 Cynthia Jo Franecki cfranecki@foley.com, lvanderboom@foley.com, mlucas@foley.com 7 Eugene Goryunov 8 Gina Ann Bibby 9 Justin E. Gray athakur@foley.com, dgrimes@foley.com carlblickle@gmail.com egoryunov@kirkland.com gbibby@foley.com, mlagdameo@foley.com jegray@foley.com, dgrimes@foley.com Linda S. DeBruin ldebruin@kirkland.com, bridgett.ofosu@kirkland.com, kathleen.cawley@kirkland.com, margaret.burke@kirkland.com 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 acharfoos@kirkland.com 12 Marc Howard Cohen marc.cohen@kirkland.com, frank.carlow@kirkland.com, lesley.ahlberg@kirkland.com, mary.nguyen@kirkland.com 13 Maria A. Maras 14 Meredith Zinanni meredith.zinanni@kirkland.com, cassandra.milleville@kirkland.com, kimberly.davenport@kirkland.com maria.maras@kirkland.com 15 Michael Anthony Parks mparks@kirkland.com 16 Michael Daley Karson michael.karson@kirkland.com 17 Michael S Feldberg michael.feldberg@allenovery.com 18 Shawn Edward McDonald SEMcDonald@foley.com 19 Tiffany Patrice Cunningham tiffany.cunningham@kirkland.com 20 21 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?