Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al

Filing 541

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 540 Stipulation filed by Research In Motion Corporation, Research in Motion Limited. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/30/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)

7

R NIA

S

LI

ER

FO

m
Judge Ja

H

6

RT

5

ERED

es Ware

NO

4

I

ORD
T IS SO

A

3

UNIT
ED

2

Linda S. DeBruin
(Admitted to this Court on September 27,1991)
Aaron D. Charfoos (pro hac vice)
Meredith Zinanni (pro hac vice)
Maria A. Maras (pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

8
9
10
11

Marc H. Cohen (CA Bar No. 168773)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

12
13

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs
RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and
RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17

MFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,

Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW
Jury Trial Demanded

18

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,

19

v.

20
21

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED,
a Canadian corporation

22

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

AND

23
24
25

RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation,
Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding
Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule

Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW

1

Pursuant to this Court’s Order Setting Hearing For Motions; Denying Defendants’ Request

2

For A Case Management Conference As Moot (Dkt. 507), Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant

3

Mformation Technologies, Inc. (“Mformation”) and Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs

4

Research In Motion Limited and Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”) jointly

5

stipulate to the following briefing schedule in advance of the hearing set for September 26, 2011:

6
7

1.

RIM will file the following motions for summary judgment described in the Request

for Case Management Conference Regarding RIM’s Dispositive Motions (Dkt. 500):

8

a.

9

RIM’s Motion For Summary Judgment That Claims 1, 4–6, 21–25, And 27 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,970,917 Are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112;

10

b.

RIM’s Motion For Summary Judgment That U.S. Patent No. 6,970,917 Is Not

11

Entitled To Claim Priority To U.S. Prov. Patent Appl. 60/251,034 And That

12

Claim 1 Of The ’917 Patent Is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 102;

13

c.

RIM’s Motion For Summary Judgment of No Infringement By RIM;

14

d.

RIM’s Renewed Motion For Summary Judgment Of No Infringement Under

15

The Doctrine Of Equivalents; and

16

e.

17
18
19

RIM’s Motion For Summary Judgment That Mformation Cannot Recover
Any Damages For Alleged Infringement Occurring Before October 27, 2008.

2.

Mformation will file the following motions for summary judgment described in the

Request for Case Management Conference Regarding Mformation’s Dispositive Motions (Dkt. 501):

20

a.

Mformation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Laches;

21

b.

Mformation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Prior Public Use Under

22
23

35 U.S.C. § 102;
c.

24
25

Mformation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Anticipation under 35
U.S.C. § 102;

d.

Mformation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Indefiniteness, No Lack

26

of Written Description, and No Lack of Enablement Under 35 U.S.C. § 112;

27

and

28

e.

Mformation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct.

Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding
Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule

Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW

1
2
3
4
5

3.

Opening briefs for each of the motions for summary judgment listed in paragraphs 1

and 2 will be filed on July 11, 2011.
4.

Opposition briefs for each of the motions for summary judgment listed in paragraphs

1 and 2 will be filed on August 1, 2011.
5.

Reply briefs for each of the motions for summary judgment listed in paragraphs 1 and

6

2 will be filed on August 15, 2011.

7

DATED: June 29, 2011

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

8
By:
9
10
11

/s/ Amar L. Thakur
Amar L. Thakur
Shawn E. McDonald
Allen A. Arntsen
Lisa M. Noller
Justin E. Gray

Attorneys for Mformation Technologies, Inc.

12
13
DATED: June 29, 2011

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

14
15

By:

16
17

/s/ Maria A. Maras
Linda S. DeBruin
Mark H. Cohen (CA Bar No. 168773)
Aaron D. Charfoos
Meredith Zinanni
Maria A. Maras

18
Attorneys for Research In Motion Limited and
Research In Motion Corporation

19
20
21

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Maria A.

22

Maras hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding
Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule

-2-

Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

3
4

Date:

June 30

, 2011
James Ware
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding
Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule

-3-

Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I hereby certify that on June 29, 2011 a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically

3

through the Court’s CM/ECF system, with notice of case activity automatically generated and sent

4

electronically to all parties.

5
6

DATED: June 29, 2011

7

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ John Kanive
John Kanive
Intellectual Property Legal Assistant

8
9

Linda S. DeBruin
(Admitted to this Court on September 27, 1991)
Aaron D. Charfoos (pro hac vice)
Meredith Zinanni (pro hac vice)
Maria A. Maras (pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Marc H. Cohen (CA Bar No. 168773)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs
Research In Motion Limited and Research In Motion
Corporation

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding
Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule

-4-

Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW