Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al

Filing 760

ORDER granting 759 Stipulation filed by Research In Motion Corporation, Research in Motion Limited; taking motions under submission; setting time for oral argument. Signed by Judge James Ware on March 8, 2012. (jwlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 08-04990 JW

Mformation Techs., Inc.,

11

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION;
TAKING MOTIONS UNDER
SUBMISSION; SETTING TIME FOR
ORAL ARGUMENT ON CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION

Plaintiff,
v.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
Research in Motion Ltd., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14

/

15
Presently before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation. (Docket Item No. 759.) In their
16
Stipulation, the parties request the Court’s permission: (1) to bring “certain technical equipment,
17
including a projector, screen, document camera, speaker, easel, monitors, laptops, and related
18
equipment” into court for the March 12 hearing in this case; and (2) to allow certain technicians “to
19
setup [sic] and breakdown [sic] this technical equipment.” (Id.)
20
Upon review, the Court finds good cause to permit the parties to bring technical equipment
21
to the March 12 hearing and to allow their technicians to set up and break down this equipment.
22
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation.
23
Further, upon review of the pending motions in this case, the Court finds it appropriate to
24

take the following motions under submission without oral argument:1

25
26
27
28

1

See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).

1

(1)

Research in Motion Ltd.’s and Research in Motion Corp.’s Notice of Motion and

2

Motion Under Daubert [sic] to Exclude the Opinions of Mr. Roy Weinstein, Docket

3

Item No. 416;

4

(2)

Plaintiff Mformation Technologies, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Portions of the March

5

4, 2011 Expert Report of Defendants’ Expert, Dr. Anthony Acampora, Docket Item

6

No. 419;

7

(3)

8

RIM’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Bifurcate Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 42(B) [sic], Docket Item No. 697;

9

(4)

RIM’s Notice of Motion and Motion Under Daubert to Exclude Dr. Vijay Madisetti’s
Opinions on Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, Docket Item No. 708;

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

and

12

(5)

13

Research in Motion Limited’s and Research in Motion Corporation’s Renewed
Motion and Memorandum for Sanctions, Docket Item No. 747.

14

Thus, the only matter remaining for oral argument at the March 12 hearing is the claim

15

construction of the term “establishing a connection between the wireless device and the server.”2

16

Each side shall have twenty (20) minutes for oral argument as to its proposed construction of that

17

term.

18
19

Dated: March 8, 2012
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

(See Preliminary Pretrial Conference Scheduling Order at 1-2, Docket Item No. 700.)
2

1

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

2

Aaron D. Charfoos [e-mail]
Allen A. Arntsen [e-mail]
Amardeep Lal Thakur [e-mail]
Christopher R. Liro [e-mail]
Eugene Goryunov [e-mail]
Jessica Christine Kaiser [e-mail]
Justin E. Gray [e-mail]
Linda S. DeBruin [e-mail]
Lisa Marie Noller [e-mail]
Marc Howard Cohen [e-mail]
Maria A. Maras [e-mail]
Meredith Zinanni [e-mail]
Michael Anthony Parks [e-mail]
Michael Daley Karson [e-mail]
Michael S Feldberg [e-mail]
Shawn Edward McDonald [e-mail]
Tiffany Patrice Cunningham [e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
Dated: March 8, 2012
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By:

/s/ JW Chambers
Susan Imbriani
Courtroom Deputy