craigslist, Inc. v. Doe

Filing 82

ORDER re 65 MOTION to Vacate Judgment filed by Paul Hubert. Signed by Judge James Ware on October 25, 2011. (jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NO. C 08-05067 JW craigslist, Inc., 11 ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO PRODUCE APPROPRIATE WITNESSES FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON OCTOBER 31, 2011 Plaintiff, v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Paul Hubert, 13 Defendant. 14 15 / Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment.1 A hearing 16 on the Motion is scheduled for October 31, 2011. In his Motion, Defendant contends that the 17 Court’s Judgment against him must be vacated because he was never properly served with notice of 18 this action. (See Motion at 1.) 19 Upon review of the papers submitted to date, the Court finds that an evidentiary hearing is 20 necessary on the question of whether Defendant was properly served with notice of this action. 21 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that counsel for both parties secure their respective witnesses to 22 give testimony under oath at the October 31, 2011 hearing. 23 24 Dated: October 25, 2011 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 25 26 27 1 28 (Defendant Paul Hubert’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (FRCP 60(b)(4)), hereafter, “Motion,” Docket Item No. 65.) 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Brian Patrick Hennessy bhennessy@perkinscoie.com Elizabeth L. McDougall EmcDougall@perkinscoie.com Jeffrey Michael Hanson Jhanson@perkinscoie.com Liling Poh lpoh@perkinscoie.com Matthew William Kumin matt@kuminsommers.com 3 4 5 Dated: October 25, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ JW Chambers Susan Imbriani Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?