Cormier v. Nvidia Corporation
Filing
11
RELATED CASE ORDER. The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/25/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 08-04312 JW C 08-04332 JF
Nakash v. Nvidia Corporation Inicom Networks, Inc. V. Nividia Corporation et al
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________
C 08-04393 RS
Meisel v. Apple Computer, Inc.
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________
C 08-04596 RS
Feinstein v. NVIDIA Corporation
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. ___JW______
C 08-05082 HRL
Cormier v. Nvidia Corporation
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________
C 08-05179 HRL
National Business Offices Association, Inc v. Nividia Corporation et al
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________
ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. -1-
Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge. Dated:__11/25/2008___ Judge James Ware
-2-
CLERK'S NOTICE The court has reviewed the motion and determined that following cases are not related to C 08-04312 JW Nakash v. Nvidia Corporation and no reassignments shall occur: C 08-04332 JF C 08-04393 RS C 08-05082 HRL C 08-05179 HRL
Inicom Networks, Inc. V. Nividia Corporation et al Meisel v. Apple Computer, Inc. Cormier v. Nvidia Corporation National Business Offices Association, Inc v. Nividia Corporation et al
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above.
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk DATED: December 3,2008 By: Deputy Clerk
Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program:
(date)
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?