United States of America et al v. Rubio

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE 14 . Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/24/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-O78T) Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256) 9th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7000 Fax: (415) 436-6748 Attorneys for the United States of America *E-FILED - 3/24/09* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KRISTIN FEDDERSEN, Revenue Agent, Petitioners, v. JAVIER ARELLANO RUBIO ) ) ) No. C-08-05153-RMW ) XXXXXXXXXXX ) APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED]X ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) 14 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 // 27 28 Dated: March 23, 2009: Petitioners, United States of America and Kristin Feddersen, Revenue Agent, hereby advise the Court that respondent, Javier Arellano Rubio, has complied with the Internal Revenue Service summons and request that this action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ Cynthia Stier CYNTHIA STIER Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 xxxxxxxxxxx Application and [proposed] Order of Dismissal, United States, et al. v. Rubio, Case No. C-08-05153-RMW 3/24/09 Dated:_________________ ORDER Upon the request of the petitioners and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action is hereby dismissed. ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?