Arizmendi et al v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 140

ORDER SETTING DATE FOR HEARING RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Deadline to file Motion due by 10/28/2011. Opposition due by 11/11/2011. Reply due by 11/18/2011. Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Joint Pretrial Conference statement due 11/22/2011. Pretrial Conference set for 12/2/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/16/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 NO. 5:08-cv-05163-EJD Therese Arizmendi et al, 6 ORDER SETTING DATE FOR HEARING RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Plaintiff(s), v. 7 City of San Jose et al, 8 Defendant(s). 9 / On April 25, 2011 the case was transferred to this Court for all purposes (See Docket Item 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. 138). The parties timely filed their joint case management conference statement and requested 12 the Court set a hearing on the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (See Docket 13 Item No. 139). The parties previous deadline for hearing dispositive motions was extended to June 14 27, 2011. On May 25, 2011, Defendants contacted the Court and secured a hearing date of 15 December 2, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. According to the Court’s availability this was the first date for 16 hearing a summary judgment motion. Given the age of the case and the request of the parties’ for 17 hearing the renewed summary judgment motion, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: 18 19 (1) 20 2011, 21 (2) 22 2011, 23 (3) 24 2011, 25 (4) Pretrial Conference set for December 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m., 26 (5) Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due on or before November 22, 2011. 27 // 28 // Deadline to file Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on or before October 28, Deadline for Plaintiffs’ to file an Opposition to the Motion on or before November 11, Deadline for Defendants’ to file a reply to the Motion due on or before November 18, 1 2 3 None of the dates set in this Order may be changed without an order of the Court made after a motion is filed pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of Court. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: August 16, 2011 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NO. C 08-05163 EJD ORDER SETTING DATE FOR HEARING RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Andrew Vinson Stearns astearns@boglawyers.com Daisy M. Nishigaya Daisy.Nishigaya@sanjoseca.gov Ignascio Gallegos Camarena igc@dimalantaclark.com Joseph P. DiCiuccio cao.main@sanjoseca.gov M. Jeffery Kallis M_J_Kallis@Kallislaw.org Michael J. Dodson cao.main@sanjoseca.gov Michael R. Groves CAO.Main@sanjoseca.gov Steven Michael Berki sberki@loboinc.com 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: August 16, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 8 By: 9 /s/ EJD Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 NO. C 08-05163 EJD ORDER SETTING DATE FOR HEARING RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?