Arizmendi et al v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
155
ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH PRIOR COURT ORDER. The parties are directed to file a Joint Status Conference Statement which complies with the courts prior order no later than 4:00 p.m. on 2/29/2012. The parties are advised that the court will vacate the Status Conference, will not extend the stay, and will set a schedule without the parties input should they again fail to comply. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/28/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2012)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
CASE NO. 5:08-cv-05163 EJD
THERESE ARIZMENDI, et. al..,
6
ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
PRIOR COURT ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
7
8
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et. al.,
9
Defendant(s).
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
The above-entitled action is scheduled for a Status Conference on March 2, 2012. As part of
12
the order which scheduled the conference and stayed the case until March 6, 2012, the court required
13
the parties to file, on or before February 24, 2012, a Joint Status Conference Statement which
14
provides, inter alia, an update as to the status of the case as well as a proposal for rescheduling the
15
previously-vacated motion hearing and Preliminary Pretrial Conference. See Docket Item No. 154.
16
To date, the parties have filed to comply as directed.
17
Accordingly, the parties are directed to file a Joint Status Conference Statement which
18
complies with the court’s prior order no later than 4:00 p.m. on February 29, 2012. The parties
19
are advised that the court will vacate the Status Conference, will not extend the stay, and will set a
20
schedule without the parties’ input should they again fail to comply.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: February 28, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:08-cv-05163 EJD
ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH PRIOR COURT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?