Martinez v. McDonald

Filing 30

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 27 , 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 *E-FILED - 6/6/11* 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 No. C 08-5232 RMW (PR) WILLIAM VASQUEZ MARTINEZ, ORDER GRANTING THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER Petitioner, v. MIKE MCDONALD, Warden, 15 Respondent. / 16 17 (Docket Nos. 27 and 28) Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Before the 18 court is respondent’s third and fourth requests for an extension of time to file an answer. In his 19 motions, respondent states that the original attorney for the case was called overseas for active duty 20 with the U.S. Army Reserve Unit. The case was reassigned to current counsel, who requests 21 additional time to prepare. 22 The court will GRANT respondent an extension of time up to and including June 14, 2011. 23 Petitioner shall file his traverse within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent’s response. 24 The court notes that these are respondent’s third and fourth requests for an extension of time. 25 Because this case has been pending since 2008, any further requests for an extension of time will not 26 be granted absent exigent circumstances. 27 28 This order terminates docket nos. 27 and 28. DATED: 6/6/11 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge Order Granting Third and Fourth Requests for an Extension of Time to File Answer P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.08\Martinez232.4thEot-Answer.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?