Martinez v. McDonald
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 27 , 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
1
2
3
*E-FILED - 6/6/11*
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
No. C 08-5232 RMW (PR)
WILLIAM VASQUEZ MARTINEZ,
ORDER GRANTING THIRD AND
FOURTH REQUESTS FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER
Petitioner,
v.
MIKE MCDONALD, Warden,
15
Respondent.
/
16
17
(Docket Nos. 27 and 28)
Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Before the
18
court is respondent’s third and fourth requests for an extension of time to file an answer. In his
19
motions, respondent states that the original attorney for the case was called overseas for active duty
20
with the U.S. Army Reserve Unit. The case was reassigned to current counsel, who requests
21
additional time to prepare.
22
The court will GRANT respondent an extension of time up to and including June 14, 2011.
23
Petitioner shall file his traverse within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent’s response.
24
The court notes that these are respondent’s third and fourth requests for an extension of time.
25
Because this case has been pending since 2008, any further requests for an extension of time will not
26
be granted absent exigent circumstances.
27
28
This order terminates docket nos. 27 and 28.
DATED:
6/6/11
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
Order Granting Third and Fourth Requests for an Extension of Time to File Answer
P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.08\Martinez232.4thEot-Answer.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?