Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 Extending Time for Defendant Depue to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/5/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., a Delaware corporation; and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES ECBU IP (SINGAPORE) PTE., LTD., a Singapore corporation, Plaintiffs, vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; and MARSHALL T. DEPUE a/k/a MARK DEPUE, an individual, Defendants. Plaintiffs Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. and Avago Technologies ECBU IP (Singapore) Pte., Ltd. (collectively "Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant Marshall T. DePue a/k/a Mark DePue, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on November 20, 2008, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for Violation of the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Breach of Contract, and Other Claims ("Complaint"); WHEREAS, on December 13, 2008, Plaintiffs served a copy of the Complaint on Defendant Depue; WHEREAS, Defendant Depue's response to the Complaint is due on January 2, 2009; WHEREAS, Defendant Depue requested of Plaintiffs an extension of time until February 2, 2009, to file a response to the Complaint in light of the intervening holidays and the need to investigate the allegations and prepare an appropriate response; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agreed to Defendant Depue's requested extension; -1STIP. EXTENDING DEF. DEPUE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C 08-05268-JF PVT CASE NO. C 08-05268-JF PVT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT DEPUE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // // // // // WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court order; and WHEREAS, the extension of time until February 2, 2009, does not impact the initial Rule 26(f) or case management conference deadlines set by the Court; ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree that the due date for Defendant Depue to file a response to the Complaint is extended to February 2, 2009, and request that the Court order the same. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 31, 2008 MARK T. DEPUE By:/s/ Mark T. Depue MARK T. DEPUE In pro per Dated: December 31, 2008 IRELL & MANELLA LLP By:/s/ Samuel K. Lu SAMUEL K. LU Attorneys for Plaintiffs AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., a Delaware corporation; and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES ECBU IP (SINGAPORE) PTE., LTD. Dated: December 31, 2008 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By:/s/ Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE Attorneys for Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION -2STIP. EXTENDING DEF. DEPUE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C 08-05268-JF PVT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filer's Attestation: I, Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT DEPUE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Mark T. Depue and Samuel K. Lu concur in this filing. By: ____________/s/____________________ Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. January 5, 2009 -----------------------Dated: December -___, -2008------------------------------------ ----- ----____________________________________ THE HONORABLE JEREMY D. FOGEL United States District Judge -3STIP. EXTENDING DEF. DEPUE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C 08-05268-JF PVT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?