Van et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, inc. et al

Filing 113

CORRECTED ORDER Rescheduling Hearing on Pending Motions. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 10/22/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 10/25/2010)

Download PDF
Van et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, INC. et al Doc. 113 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NATHALIE THUY VAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 08-5296 PVT CORRECTED ORDER RESCHEDULING HEA R IN G ON PENDING MOTIONS At the last Case Management Conference, this court took off calendar Plaintiff Nathalie Van's Motion to Compel and Motion for Contempt, both of which were set to be heard on October 19, 2010, as well as Defendants' two Motions to Dismiss, which which were set to be heard November 9, 2010, in order to allow the parties an opportunity to participate in a settlement conference on October 20, 2010. The case did not settle at the settlement conference. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, absent further order of the court otherwise, the four motions referenced above will be heard at 10:00 a.m. on November 30, 2010. If this date is inconvenient for either party, the parties shall promptly meet and confer regarding an alternative date and no later than November 16, 2010, file either a stipulation or their respective proposals for an alternative hearing date. Dated: 10/22/10 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 2 /s/ Donna Kirchner OSCAR RIVERA Courtroom Deputy for copies handed to Plaintiff Van on Nathalie Thuy Van 1037 N. Abbott Avenue Milpitas, CA 95035 10/25/10 to: Counsel automatically notified of this filing via the court' s Electronic Case Filing system.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?