Yahoo! Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against American Airlines, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 54611004251.). Filed byYahoo! Inc.. (srm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2008) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/5/2008: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (gm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Yahoo! Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc. Doc. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) MJacobs@mofo.com J. THOMAS MCCARTHY (CA SBN 034728) TMcCarthy@mofo.com LYNN M. HUMPHREYS (CA SBN 168062) LHumphreys@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff YAHOO! INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND RELATED CLAIMS DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc. ("Yahoo!") brings this Complaint against American Airlines, Inc. ("American Airlines") for a declaratory judgment that Yahoo!'s placement of keyword-triggered Internet advertising is lawful. Yahoo! is a global Internet portal. Yahoo! provides a wide variety of services to users, including an Internet search engine, email accounts, online content such as news and financial information, and maps and directions. Most of Yahoo!'s online content and services are provided for free. Yahoo! profits from these free services primarily through the sale of advertising that appears along with these free services. Some of this advertising involves the placement of sponsored advertisements on the search results pages generated by Yahoo!'s well-known Internet search engine. Typically, these sponsored advertisements are triggered by the use of "keywords." COMPLAINT sf-2607092 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Advertisers bid on keywords and pay Yahoo! so that their ads may appear on the Yahoo! search results page when those keywords are entered into the Yahoo! search engine. In some cases, an advertiser may bid on a keyword that is a trademark of another company. Thus, for example, a reseller of airline tickets may bid on the name of an airline whose tickets it resells so that its advertisements appear in the sponsored search section of the results page when that airline's name is searched. This dispute arises from Yahoo!'s acceptance of keyword-triggered advertisements concerning the claimed trademarks of Defendant American Airlines. Yahoo! respects the intellectual property rights of others. To that end, Yahoo! has developed a policy and practice regarding its keyword-triggered sponsored advertising services that are mindful of third-party trademark rights. For example, Yahoo!'s policy does not allow an advertiser to bid on a competitor's trademark as a keyword. Consistent with well-accepted principles of trademark law, moreover, Yahoo!'s policy allows only for "nominative fair use" of a third-party's trademark in keyword-triggered advertising. As enunciated by the Ninth Circuit in New Kids on the Block v. News Am. Pub., Inc., 971 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1992), nominative fair use allows a person to use the trademark of another as a reference to describe the other's product, or to compare it to his own. Applying these principles, Yahoo!'s policy allows resellers, for example, to bid on keywords for trademarks of the products or services they sell. Thus, for example, a travel portal website that allows a customer to purchase tickets for an American Airlines flight is permitted to bid on keywords that include the registered trademark "American Airlines." Likewise, "American Airlines Center" is a registered trademark of Defendant American Airlines, and it is the name of a sports and entertainment venue in Dallas. Tickets to American Airlines Center events are sold by a variety of ticket resellers. Yahoo! accepts keyword-triggered advertising from these ticket resellers -- so that if an Internet user is searching for tickets to events at the venue and the keywords "American Airlines Center" are entered into the search box, the resellers' advertisements may appear in the Sponsored Search section of the search results page. This practice is no different from a newspaper accepting advertisements from an electronics retailer COMPLAINT sf-2607092 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 who places an advertisement announcing "Sony Televisions on Sale". As long as the retailer does, in fact, sell Sony televisions, under long-established trademark principles, the retailer's advertisement is lawful. Likewise here, because Yahoo!'s policy and practice regarding keyword-triggered advertisements properly qualify as nominative fair use under trademark law, Yahoo! is not liable for any of the claims that American Airlines has asserted, including but not limited to federal trademark infringement, in an action currently pending in the Northern District of Texas. THE PARTIES 1. Yahoo! is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Sunnyvale, California, in the Northern District of California. Yahoo! is, and was at all times herein mentioned, qualified to do business in California. Among its many Internet services, Yahoo! provides, for example, Internet search engine services to Internet users and advertising services to businesses and educational and governmental entities involved in Internet sales and marketing, including numerous entities within the jurisdiction of this Court. 2. Defendant American Airlines, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Based on information and belief, American Airlines is a multi-national airline that, together with its affiliates, serves 250 cities in over 40 countries, including cities within the jurisdiction of this Court, and that provides airline travel services to individuals within the jurisdiction of this Court. VENUE AND JURISDICTION 3. Jurisdiction is proper in this court because this litigation arises under federal law, namely 17 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. (Lanham Act). The Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question), 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) (trademarks), and 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (Declaratory Judgment Act). 4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over American Airlines because American Airlines conducts business in the State of California and within this district, including providing COMPLAINT sf-2607092 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 flights to and from commercial airports within California and promoting its airline and other travel services to California residents. 5. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1391(c). In addition, pursuant to a written agreement, the parties agreed to submit disputes between them to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Los Angeles County or Santa Clara County, California. 6. Assignment to the San Jose Division is appropriate pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-2(c), as a substantial part of the events which give rise to the claims alleged in this Complaint have occurred in Santa Clara County, where Yahoo! has its principal place of business and because the parties' contract designates exclusive jurisdiction to the state and federal courts in Santa Clara County. 7. An actual case or controversy has arisen between the parties. On October 17, 2008, American Airlines brought suit against Yahoo! and its former subsidiary, Overture Services, Inc. d/b/a Yahoo! Search Marketing ("Overture") in the Northern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 4-08CV-626-A (the "Texas Action"). Overture was merged into Yahoo! as of October 1, 2008, and no longer exists as a separate legal entity. American Airlines's Complaint in the Texas Action alleges that Yahoo!'s and/or Overture's placement of keyword-triggered advertisements constitutes trademark infringement and other related claims under the Lanham Act and Texas state laws. Yahoo! has moved to transfer the Texas Action to this Court based on the forum selection clause in the parties' contract. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS I. 8. Yahoo!'s Online Network and Keyword Advertising Founded in 1994 by two Stanford graduate students, Yahoo! has become the world's largest global online network of integrated services, with more than 500 million users worldwide. Its website at www.yahoo.com provides a wide variety of information and services to individuals and businesses. It is one of the most frequently visited Internet destinations in the world. COMPLAINT sf-2607092 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9. Yahoo! makes much of its content and many of its services available without charge. For example, Yahoo! Search is the second largest search engine on the Internet. Yahoo! Mail is an email service offering even basic users a full gigabyte of mail storage. Yahoo! Finance provides stock quotes, international market data, and financial news (among other services). Yahoo! News has up to the minute news reports. Yahoo! Maps displays maps and directions from one location to another. All these services are available for free. 10. Yahoo!'s revenues come primarily from selling online advertising opportunities, including the placement of advertisements based on "keyword" searches. Through a program entitled Yahoo! Search Marketing, advertisers are invited to bid on keywords that, when input into the Yahoo! search engine, may trigger the display of a sponsored result or advertisement next to and distinct from the display of non-sponsored, web-based search results. Yahoo!'s advertising customers pay Yahoo! based on the number clicks on these advertising links. 11. The Yahoo! Search Marketing program has an official policy, set forth on its website, regarding bidding on keyword triggers that might be trademarks of another company. A true and correct copy of the Yahoo! trademark policy is attached as Exhibit A. The policy states: "For bids on search terms in Yahoo! Search Marketing's Sponsored Search service, Yahoo! Search Marketing (formerly Overture Services, Inc.) requires advertisers to agree that their search terms, their listing titles and descriptions, and the content of their Web sites do not violate the trademark rights of others." Exhibit A at 1. 12. Yahoo!'s trademark policy further provides that Yahoo! Search Marketing will allow an advertiser to bid on a term that may be the trademark of another only if the advertiser presents content on its website that (a) refers to the trademark or its owner or related product in a permissible nominative manner without creating a likelihood of consumer confusion or (b) uses the term in a generic or merely descriptive manner. The advertisement itself must also display the mark so that the user understands the relevance of the sponsored search result. Examples of such permissible nominative uses of another's trademark include the sale of a product properly bearing the trademark, or commentary, criticism or other permissible information about the trademark owner or its product. See Exhibit A at 1. COMPLAINT sf-2607092 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13. In the case of nominative uses of another's trademark, Yahoo!'s trademark policy requires advertisers to meet one of two conditions: Reseller: The advertiser's site must sell (or clearly facilitate the sale of) the product or service bearing the trademark. The advertiser's title and description must disclose that the consumer will be able to purchase the product or service. The advertiser's title and description should not be written in a way that creates the impression that the advertiser is an authorized reseller unless the trademark owner has in fact designated the advertiser as an authorized reseller unless the trademark owner has in fact designated the advertiser as an authorized reseller. Information Site, Not Competitive: The primary purpose of the advertiser's site is to provide substantial information (for example, detailed product reviews or comparisons provided by unbiased sources, commentary, or news information) about the trademark owner or products or services bearing the trademark, AND the advertiser's site does not sell or promote, and is not an affiliate or partner of an entity that sells or promotes, a product or service that directly or indirectly competes with the trademark owner's products or services. The advertiser's title and description must disclose the nature of the qualifying substantial information that the consumer will find on the advertiser's site. Exhibit A at 1. 14. Finally, Yahoo!'s trademark policy provides a mechanism by which trademark owners can notify Yahoo! of trademark concerns: If you have a concern that a search term associated with an advertiser's listing is an improper use of a term that is a trademark, Yahoo! Search Marketing will review the advertiser's listing for compliance with our relevancy guidelines and, if appropriate, Yahoo! Search Marketing will remove the advertiser's listing or the content of the listing's title or description will be modified. Exhibit A at 1. 15. Yahoo!'s trademark policy and placement of keyword-triggered advertisements is consistent with the requirements for nominative fair use set forth in New Kids on the Block v. News Am. Pub., Inc., 971 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1992). II. 16. The Present Dispute As set forth above, on October 17, 2008, American Airlines brought suit in the Texas Action against Yahoo! and Overture in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. American Airlines's Complaint alleges: "Without authorization or approval COMPLAINT sf-2607092 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 from American Airlines, Defendants have sold to third parties the right to use the trademarks and service marks of American Airlines (`American Airlines Marks') or words, phrases or terms confusingly similar to those marks as `keyword' triggers that cause paid advertisements - referred to as `Sponsor Results' - to appear above or along side the `natural results.' In many cases, the text of these `Sponsor Results' also included American Airlines Marks or terms confusingly similar to those marks." American Airlines's Complaint further alleges that "[Yahoo! and Overture's] unauthorized and intentional use of the American Airlines Marks or terms confusingly similar thereto in connection with their search engine-based advertising programs infringes on American Airlines's exclusive rights in its federally registered marks and is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the source of the services offered by [Yahoo! and Overture] and their advertisers." 17. In its Complaint in the Texas Action, American Airlines objects to Yahoo! sponsored search results pages that it claims appeared when a web user performed an Internet search for the terms "American Airlines," "aa com," "americanairlinescenter.com," and "aa flights," terms which it claims are trademarks of or confusingly similar variants of trademarks of American Airlines. With respect to the searches for "americanairlinescenter.com," American Airlines objects that one of the sponsored search results was an ad for "American Airlines Center Tickets," by TicketsNow.com, offering tickets to events at the American Airlines Center arena in Dallas, Texas. 18. American Airlines's Complaint in the Texas Action alleges eleven claims for relief under federal and Texas state law, including trademark infringement, contributory trademark infringement, vicarious trademark infringement, false representation, trademark dilution, unfair competition, misappropriation, tortious interference with contract, and money had or received arising from Yahoo!'s placement of keyword-triggered advertising for third parties based on alleged American Airlines trademarks. 19. As set forth in its trademark policy, where appropriate, Yahoo! will, upon receiving notice from a trademark owner, take action to remove an advertising listing that violates Yahoo's policy. Yahoo! contends, however, that its trademark policy properly allows nominative COMPLAINT sf-2607092 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 fair use of purported American Airlines trademarks as keywords, including use as keywords by resellers of American Airlines tickets. Yahoo! denies that it is liable to American Airlines for trademark infringement or any other legal or equitable claim based on the placement of keywordtriggered advertising using American Airlines trademarks. CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Declaratory Judgment: 28 U.S.C. § 2201) 20. Yahoo! incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 19, inclusive. 21. American Airlines has claimed that Yahoo!'s placement of keyword-triggered advertisements for third-parties based on claimed trademarks of American Airlines constitutes trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and otherwise is causing actionable harm to American Airlines under various federal and state laws. American Airlines has brought the Texas Action against Yahoo! on this basis. 22. An actual, present and justiciable controversy has arisen between Yahoo! and American Airlines concerning Yahoo!'s right to place keyword-triggered advertisements for its customers based on alleged trademarks of American Airlines. 23. Yahoo! seeks declaratory judgment from this Court that its policy regarding the placement of keyword-triggered advertising based on alleged trademarks of American Airlines does not constitute trademark infringement or otherwise violate any legal or equitable rights of American Airlines. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Yahoo! respectfully requests that the Court: 1. 2. Enter judgment according to the declaratory relief sought; Award Yahoo! its costs in this action; and COMPLAINT sf-2607092 8 Legal guidelines from Yahoo! Search Marketing (formerly Overture) - Tr... 1 of 2 Yahoo! My Yahoo! Mail Search Search Marketing Home Help Trademarks Raising Trademark Concerns about Sponsored SearchTM Listings Advertisers sometimes bid on search terms that are the trademarks of others. For bids on search terms in Yahoo! Search Marketing's Sponsored Search service, Yahoo! Search Marketing (formerly Overture Services, Inc.) requires advertisers to agree that their search terms, their listing titles and descriptions, and the content of their Web sites do not violate the trademark rights of others. In cases in which an advertiser has bid on a term that may be the trademark of another, Yahoo! Search Marketing allows the bids only if the advertiser presents content on its Web site that (a) refers to the trademark or its owner or related product in a permissible nominative manner without creating a likelihood of consumer confusion (for example, sale of a product bearing the trademark, or commentary, criticism or other permissible information about the trademark owner or its product) or (b) uses the term in a generic or merely descriptive manner. In addition, the advertiser's listing should disclose the nature of the relevant content. As applied to nominative uses of another's trademark, Yahoo! Search Marketing requires advertisers to meet one of the following two conditions: 1. Re se lle r: The advertiser's site must sell (or clearly facilitate the sale of) the product or service bearing the trademark. The advertiser's title and description must disclose that the consumer will be able to purchase the product or service. The advertiser's title and description should not be written in a way that creates the impression that the advertiser is an authorized reseller unless the trademark owner has in fact designated the advertiser as an authorized reseller. 2. Inform ation Site, Not Competitive: The primary purpose of the advertiser's site is to provide substantial information (for example, detailed product reviews or comparisons provided by unbiased sources, commentary, or news information) about the trademark owner or products or services bearing the trademark, AND the advertiser's site does not sell or promote, and is not an affiliate or partner of an entity that sells or promotes, a product or service that directly or indirectly competes with the trademark owner's products or services. The advertiser's title and description must disclose the nature of the qualifying substantial information that the consumer will find on the advertiser's site. If you have a concern that a search term associated with an advertiser's listing is an improper use of a term that is a trademark, Yahoo! Search Marketing will review the advertiser's listing for compliance with our relevancy guidelines and, if appropriate, Yahoo! Search Marketing will remove the advertiser's listing or the content of the listing's title or description will be modified. In order to assist Yahoo! Search Marketing in expeditiously addressing your concern, please provide the following information: 1. T he search term which, when entered, caused the advertiser's listing to appear. 2. T he trademark on which your claim is based. 3. If you own a current registration for the trademark on the Principal Register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the registration number. 4. If you have evidence of any consumer confusion resulting from the advertiser's bid on the search term, a description of such evidence. 5. If you have contacted the advertiser about your concerns, the status of your communications with the advertiser. Please forward this information to Yahoo! Search Marketing at the following email address: trademarkconcern-ysm@yahoo-inc.com. You may also mail your concerns to: Yahoo! Search Marketing Attn: Trademark Department 3333 Empire Avenue Burbank, California 91504 Fax: 818 524-3001 If your concern is about links or advertising content appearing on a domain in our Domain Match program, please click here for more http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/legal/trademarks.php Legal guidelines from Yahoo! Search Marketing (formerly Overture) - Tr... 2 of 2 information about Yahoo! Search Marketing's notification procedure. If your concern is about a Local Sponsored Search listing, please click here for more information about Yahoo! Search Marketing's notification and counter-notification procedure for Local Sponsored Search listings. Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright/I P Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks | Patents | Help | Marketing Alliances | Advertise Internationally NOTIC E: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our Privacy Policy. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/legal/trademarks.php

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?