Tung Tai Group v. Oblon et al

Filing 47

ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/3/2010. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 **E-Filed 5/3/10** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION TUNG TAI GROUP, a California corporation, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. AARON OBLON, DEVONSHIRE METALS CORP., HASMUKH D. PATEL, and DOES 1-500, Defendants and Counterclaimants. Case Number C 08-5370 JF ORDER1 REQUESTING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE RE: Doc. No. 45 On February 12, 2010, Plaintiff Tung Tai Group ("Tung Tai") moved for summary judgment with respect to its claims for breach of contract, fraud, and conversion against Defendant Aaron Oblon ("Oblon") and with respect to its claims for fraud and conversion against Defendant H.D. Patel ("Patel"). After receiving no opposition from either Oblon or Patel, the Court vacated the scheduled hearing and granted the motion in an order dated April 12, 2010. On April 26, 2010, Oblon filed a motion to vacate the April 12 order and an affidavit opposing Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff shall file a response to the Oblon's motion, if any, on or before May 14, 2010. Oblon may file a reply to Plaintiff's responses, if any, // This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. C a s e No. C 08-5370 ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE ( JF L C 3 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on or before May 21, 2010. The matter thereafter will be taken under submission without oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 5/3/10 ___________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C a s e No. C 08-5370 ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE ( JF L C 3 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?