Jackson et al v. Oak Grove School District et al

Filing 156

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. With respect to the issue regarding the potential conflict of interests with Defendant Mouser and her law firm representing themselves as well as acting as counsel of record for the remaining public entity Defendants, the Court refers this matter to Chief Magistrate Judge James for her determination as to any conflicts. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2010. Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/25/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2010)

Download PDF
Jackson et al v. Oak Grove School District et al Doc. 156 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (2) This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on August 30, 2010. The parties have duly submitted a Joint Case Management Statement. (Docket Item No. 155.) Upon review of the parties' Joint Statement, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) In light of the December 7, 2010 Settlement Conference scheduled with Chief Magistrate Judge James, the Court finds good cause to continue the Conference to December 13, 2010 at 10 a.m. On or before December 9, 2010, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management updating the Court on the status of the Settlement Conference. With respect to the issue regarding the potential conflict of interests with Defendant Mouser and her law firm representing themselves as well as acting as counsel pf record for the remaining public entity Defendants, the Court refers this matter to Chief Magistrate Judge James for her determination as to any conflicts. v. Oak Grove School District, et al., Defendants. / Troy Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-05376 JW ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) The Court does not find that discovery is appropriate pending the December 7 Settlement Conference and the December 13 Case Management Conference. Dated: August 25, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Deanna Jean Mouser dmouser@aalrr.com Eric C Bellafronto ebellafronto@littler.com John Stanley Adler Jadler@littler.com Mark E. Davis mdavis@davisyounglaw.com Maureen A. Folan mfolan@davisyounglaw.com Robert M. Vantress, rvantress@vantresslaw.com Dated: August 25, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?