Jackson et al v. Oak Grove School District et al

Filing 225

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 223 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition re 219 218 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment. Opposition due by 11/5/2012. Replies due by 11/13/2012. Hearing set for 11/30/2012. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
J.J., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad
11 Litem, Robert M. Vantress,
12
13

CASE NO. C 08-05376 RMW

Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING RULE 6-3 MOTION
TO EXTEND TIME

vs.

14 OAK GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public
entity school district, EMANUEL (MANNY)
15 BARBARA, an individual, KATHERINE
BAKER, an individual, RICHARD
16 HOLTERMAN, an individual, TAMRA
UNCK, an individual, RISA QUON, an
17 individual, NANCY LETTENBERGER, an
individual, JACQUELINE ADAMS, an
18 individual, JEREMY NISHIHARA, an
individual, DIANNE LEMKE, an individual,
19 DENNIS HAWKINS, an individual,
DEANNA JEAN MOUSER, an individual,
20 and ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA,
RUUD & ROMO, a Professional Law
21 Corporation,
22

[Re Docket No. 223]

Defendants.

23
24

Plaintiff J.J.'s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' summary

25 judgment motions (Docket Nos. 218-222) under Local Rule 6-3 is granted. No opposition was
26 filed. The court finds good cause to give plaintiff until November 5, 2012 to file his opposition.
27 Replies are due no later than November 13, 2012. The hearing on the motions is set for November
28 30, 2012 at 9 AM.
1

1

It is so ordered.

2
DATED: October 10, 2012
3
4
5

Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2