Damar Petroleum, Inc. v. ConocoPhillips Company

Filing 35

ORDER 40 Staying Time to Respond to Complaints. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/2/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP ADAM FRIEDENBERG, Bar No. 205778 JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE, Bar No. 238559 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant ConocoPhillips Company

*E-FILED - 2/2/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN JOSE DIVISION ) Case No. M:09-cv-02040-RMW ) ) [] ORDER STAYING TIME ) TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS ) ) ) ) ) )

In re: ConocoPhillips Co. Service Station Rent Contract Litigation

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT ORDERS that: (1) ConocoPhillips Company's time to respond to the complaints is stayed pending Plaintiffs' filing of a joint amended complaint; (2) COP shall have 30 days from filing of the amended complaint to respond; and (3) The parties are ordered to update the Court on the status of the cases and the filing of the joint complaint prior to the Case Management Conference on February 5, 2010. Dated: February 2, 2010 ______________________________ District Court Judge

-1ORDER RE STIPULATION TO STAY TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINTS