Chatman v. Astrue

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MOOT re 21 Stipulation. The Stipulation is found as MOOT. The Motion for Summary Judgment has been filed as stipulated by the parties, see 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/5/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 Attorney for Plaintiff /jgl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PATRICIA A. CHATMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) Case No: C08-05535 JW RS ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time of (14) days up through and including Monday, October 19, 2009 in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by the number of other cases (6) Plaintiff's counsel currently has before this district court and other district courts that also require briefing around this time. 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney Dated: September 29, 2009 /s/ ODELL GROOMS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Dated: September 29, 2009 /s/ HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff PATRICIA A. CHATMAN IT IS SO ORDERED. The Stipulation is found as MOOT. The Motion for Summary Judgment has been filed as stipulated by the parties (Docket Item No. 22). Dated: November 5, 2009 HON. JAMES WARE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?