Chatman v. Astrue

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOUND AS MOOT for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment re 29 Stipulation. Plaintiff has filed her response prior to the stipulated deadline. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/20/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 Attorney for Plaintiff /jgl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PATRICIA A. CHATMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) Case No: C08-05535 JW RS ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) FOUND AS MOOT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (14) days up through and including Tuesday, January 19, 2010 in which to e-file her Response to Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by the number of other cases (4) Plaintiff's counsel 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 currently has before this district court and other district courts that also require briefing around this time. JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney Dated: January 5, 2010 /s/ ODELL GROOMS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Dated: January 5, 2010 /s/ HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff PATRICIA A. CHATMAN IT IS SO ORDERED. The Stipulation is found as moot. The Plaintiff has filed her response prior to the stipulated deadline. Dated: January 20, 2010 HON. JAMES WARE United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?