Swain v. CACH, LLC et al

Filing 107

ORDER RE: FINAL APPROVAL HEARING. The Court finds that the parties' submissions are not complete for its evaluation of the Final Settlement. Accordingly, on or before September 24, 2010 at 10 a.m., the parties shall file and lodge with the Court : (1) A signed copy of the revised Final Settlement Agreement; (2) Verification that the revised Notice was sent to Class Members, rather than the original version; (3) Verification that both Spanish and English versions of the Notice were mailed to Class Members; (4) Verification that the Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees comports with the Ninth Circuit's requirements for attorney fee applications under In re Mercury Interactive Secs. Litig., No. 08-17372, slip op. at 12202 (Aug. 18, 2010). Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/23/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2010)

Download PDF
Swain v. CACH, LLC et al Doc. 107 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Juanita Swain, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-05562 JW ORDER RE: FINAL APPROVAL HEARING CACH, LLC, et al., Defendants. / United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This case is set for a hearing on September 27, 2010 at 9 a.m. for Final Approval of Class Settlement. On September 21, 2010, the parties filed their Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Judgment; Award of Attorneys' Fees and supporting documents. (See Docket Item Nos. 100106.) The Court finds that the parties' submissions are not complete for its evaluation of the Final Settlement. Accordingly, on or before September 24, 2010 at 10 a.m., the parties shall file and lodge with the Court: (1) (2) A signed copy of the revised Final Settlement Agreement; Verification that the revised Notice was sent to Class Members, rather than the original version; (3) Verification that both Spanish and English versions of the Notice were mailed to Class Members; (4) Verification that the Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees comports with the Ninth Circuit's requirements for attorney fee applications under In re Mercury Interactive Secs. Litig., No. 08-17372, slip op. at 12202 (Aug. 18, 2010). Dated: September 23, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Kathleen Mary Kushi Carter kcarter@hollins-law.com Linda Luna lluna@hollins-law.com Scott C. Maurer smaurer@scu.edu Stephen Alter Scott sscott@hayesscott.com William Eric Kennedy willkennedy@pacbell.net Dated: September 23, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?