Medimmune, LLC v. PDL Biopharma, Inc.

Filing 742

ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL GRANTING 673 UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION BY NONPARTIES DAVID MOTT, MICHAEL RICHMAN, LESLIE SYDNOR JOHNSON AND JAMES YOUNG FOR LEAVE TO SPECIALLY APPEAR FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF OPPOSING PDL'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING DEPOSITIONS. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2010)

Download PDF
Medimmune, LLC v. PDL Biopharma, Inc. Doc. 742 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NONPARTIES' MOTION TO SPECIALLY APPEAR FOR LIMITED PURPOSE **E-Filed 8/30/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. C 08-5590 JF ___________ _ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION BY NONPARTIES DAVID MOTT, MICHAEL RICHMAN, LESLIE SYDNOR JOHNSON AND JAMES YOUNG FOR LEAVE TO SPECIALLY APPEAR FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF OPPOSING PDL'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING DEPOSITIONS [DKT. NO. 605] MEDIMMUNE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PDL BIOPHARMA Defendant. Nonparties David Mott, Michael Richman, Leslie Sydnor Johnson and James Young have moved this Court for leave to specially appear for the limited purpose of opposing PDL's motion for an order directing depositions of them [Dkt. No. 605]. Having considered the motion, it is hereby GRANTED. Messrs. Mott, Richman, Johnson and Young are hereby granted leave to specially appear for the limited purpose of opposing PDL's motion [Dkt. No. 605], via both briefing and oral argument, without waiving and without any present or future prejudice to their positions on personal, statutory, and subject matter jurisdiction. In accordance with this Order, the opposition brief of Messrs. Mott, Richman, Johnson and Young and its accompanying papers are hereby deemed FILED. 8-30-10 DATED: _______________________ ____________________________________ HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE _________ CASE NO. C 08-5590-JF Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?