Acer America Corp. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,

Filing 30

ORDER granting extension to respond to amended complaint. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/20/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009)

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 1 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y.

MCKOOL SMITH PC Gayle Rosenstein Klein State Bar No. 237975 399 Park Avenue, Suite 3200 New York, New York 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT Wi-LAN Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Subject to its special appearance, specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc., by and through its counsel, requests that defendant's time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint be extended until a date ten (10) days after Judge James Ware rules on Wi-LAN Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, and Motion to Transfer to First Filed Forum, filed January 15, 2009, in a related declaratory judgment action styled Intel Corp. v Wi-LAN Inc. et al, 5:08-cv-4555 (N.D. Cal.). This stipulated request is made on the grounds that the parties wish to avoid duplicative motion practice. Judge Ware's anticipated ruling in the Intel case will give the parties substantial guidance as to how to proceed and may eliminate the need for motion practice in the instant
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

ACER AMERICA CORP., APPLE INC., DELL INC., AND GATEWAY, INC. Plaintiffs, v. WI-LAN INC., Defendant.

Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

MCKOOL SMITH

-1-

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 2 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N. Y.

action. Accordingly, it is in the interest of private and judicial economy to extend the time for Wi-LAN Inc. to answer or otherwise plead until a date ten (10) days after this Court's ruling in Intel Corp. v. Wi-LAN Inc. et al. Defendant's time to respond to the complaint has been previously extended one time by Order dated February 6, 2009 (DI 18). Plaintiffs Acer America Corp., Apple Inc., Dell Inc., and Gateway Inc. stipulate to such extension and, therefore, do not oppose defendant's request. So stipulated,

Dated: February 20, 2009 By:

MCKOOL SMITH PC /s/ Gayle Rosenstein Klein State Bar No. 237975 MCKOOL SMITH PC 399 Park Avenue, Suite 3200 New York, New York 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MCKOOL SMITH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

-2-

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 3 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y.

Dated: February 20, 2009

ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP By: /s/ Michael C. Spillner State Bar No. 205785 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail]. G. Hopkins Guy, III State Bar No. 124811 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Kai Tseng State Bar No. 193756 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MCKOOL SMITH

Attorney for Plaintiffs ACER AMERICA CORP. and GATEWAY, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

-3-

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 4 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N. Y.

Dated: February 20, 2009

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP By: /s/ Mark C. Scarsi State Bar No. 183926 MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP 601 South Figueroa Street 30th Floor Los Angeles , CA 90017-5735 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff APPLE INC.

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

MCKOOL SMITH

-4-

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 5 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y.

Dated: February 20, 2009 By:

JONES DAY /s/ Arthur S. Beeman State Bar No. 237996 JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Pamela K. Fulmer State Bar No. 154736 JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Thomas R. Jackson (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY 2727 North Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201-1515 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Daniel T. Conrad (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY 2727 North Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201-1515 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff DELL, INC.

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MCKOOL SMITH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

-5-

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 6 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y.

Upon the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED that specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc.'s time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint herein is hereby extended until a date ten (10) days after this Court's ruling on Wi-LAN Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and Motion to Transfer to First Filed Forum, filed January 15, 2009, in a related declaratory judgment action styled Intel Corp. v Wi-LAN Inc. et al, 5:08-cv-4555 (N.D. Cal.).

2/20/09 Dated: ________________, 2009

By: United States District Court Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

MCKOOL SMITH

-6-

Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW

Document 26

Filed 02/20/2009

Page 7 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 20, 2009, a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF System. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court's electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing through the Court's electronic filing system.

By:

/s/ Michael G. McManus Michael G. McManus

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI)
Dallas 272777v1

MCKOOL SMITH

-1-