Sigma Six Technologies, Inc. et al v. Nagarro, Inc. et al

Filing 43

*** FILED IN ERROR; PLEASE SEE 53 *** ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR NAGARRO, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT re 38 Stipulation. Plaintiffs have filed a timely opposition,Defendants shall file their Reply on or before April 13, 2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/7/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009) Modified docket text on 4/30/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Professional Corporation San Jose

IS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT T R I C T
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

N

D

OF

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SIGMA SIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a New York corporation and SIGMA SIX CONSULTING, LLC, a New York limited liability company, Plaint iffs, v. NAGARRO, INC., a New Jersey corporation, T-SYSTEMS ENTERPRISE SERVICES GmbH, a German business entity, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

CASE NO. C08-05633 JW (PVT) STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT NAGARRO, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Judge: The Honorable James Ware

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Defendant Nagarro, Inc. and Plaintiffs Sigma Six Technologies, Inc., and Sigma Six Consulting, LLC, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant Nagarro, Inc. have an extension of time, to and including April 20, 2009, to file its response to Plaintiffs' Complaint. IT IS SO STIPULATED: /// /// ///
RC1/5285757.1/NB

Stipulation to Extend the Time for Nagarro, Inc. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order C08-05633 JW (PVT)

A

Attorneys for Defendant NAGARRO, INC.

ER

C

LI

FO

mes Wa Judge Ja

re

R NIA

MICHAEL J. IOANNOU (SBN 95208) ELISE R. VASQUEZ (SBN 201190) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113-2429 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail]

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

DENIE

D

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Professional Corporation San Jose

Dated: April 6, 2009

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

By: /s/ Michael J. Ioannou MICHAEL J. IOANNOU ELISE R. VASQUEZ Attorneys for Defendant NAGARRO, INC. Dated: April 6, 2009 DHILLON & SMITH LLP

By: (See attached Exhibit "A.") HARMEET K. DHILLON DAVID LIN Attorneys for Plaintiffs SIGMA SIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and SIGMA SIX CONSULTING, LLC

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RC1/5285757.1/NB

ORDER Since ant to the stipulation a timely opposition, Defendants shall file their Reply on or Pursu Plaintiffs have filed between the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Nagarro, Inc. have to and including before April 13, 2009 consistent with the schedule as set forth in the Civil Local Rules. April 20, 2009 to file its response to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Dated: ____l_7,_2009 _________ Apri _ ____ THE HONORABLE JUDGE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

-2-

Stipulation to Extend the Time for Nagarro, Inc. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order C08-05633 JW (PVT)