Sigma Six Technologies, Inc. et al v. Nagarro, Inc. et al

Filing 68

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1) re 67 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/16/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11 A Professional Corporation San Jose MICHAEL J. IOANNOU (SBN 95208) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113-2429 Telephone: (408) 287-6262 Facsimile: (408) 918-4501 Email: mioannou@rmkb.com BETH H. PARKER (SBN 104773) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2700 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 356-3000 Facsimile: (415) 356-3099 Email: Beth.Parker@aporter.com Attorneys for Defendant NAGARRO, INC. (Additional counsel listed on signature page.) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. SIGMA SIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a New York corporation and SIGMA SIX CONSULTING, LLC, a New York limited liability company, Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C08-05633 JW (PVT) STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE NAGARRO, INC., a New Jersey corporation, T-SYSTEMS ENTERPRISE SERVICES GmbH, a German business entity, and DOES 1-10. Defendants. Judge: The Honorable James Ware IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned case be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. RC1/5448412.1/NB 1 Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice; [Proposed] Order Case No. C08-05633 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11 A Professional Corporation San Jose Dated: December 10, 2009 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY By: /s/ Michael J. Ioannou (See Exhibit A) MICHAEL J. IOANNOU Attorneys for Defendant NAGARRO, INC. Dated: December ___, 2009 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: (See Exhibit A) BETH H. PARKER Attorneys for Defendant NAGARRO, INC. Dated: December ___, 2009 BROOKS WILKINS SHARKET & TURCO 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court terminates any remaining pending deadlines, hearings and motions. The Clerk shall close this file. By: (See Exhibit A) MICHAEL R. TURCO (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant T-SYSTEMS ENTERPRISE SERVICES GmbH Dated: December ___, 2009 DHILLON & SMITH LLP By: (See Exhibit B) HARMEET K. DHILLON Attorneys for Plaintiffs SIGMA SIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and SIGMA SIX CONSULTING, LLC [PROPOSED] ORDER Dated: December 16, 2009 JUDGE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -2Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice; [Proposed] Order Case No. C08-05633 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?