E&E, Co LTD v. Divatex Home Fashion, Inc. et al

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER 71 of Dismissal of Parties, DWI Holdings, Inc., DWI Holdings, Inc., DWI Holdings, Inc., DWI Holdings, Inc., Himatsingka America, Inc., Himatsingka America, Inc., Himatsingka America, Inc., Himatsingka America, Inc., DWI Holdings, Inc. and DWI Holdings, Inc. terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/22/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9 4111

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ROBERT CHARLES WARD (Bar #160824) JAMES P. MARTIN (Bar #170044) FELICIA A. DRAPER (Bar #242668) KATHERINE R. MILLER (Bar #247390) One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff E&E Co., Ltd.

*E-FILED - 1/22/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v.

E&E Co., Ltd., a California Corporation, Plaintiff,

Case No. C-08-05660 RMW STIPULATION TO DISMISS [FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41] AND ORDER

DIVATEX HOME FASHION, INC., a New York corporation, DWI HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation and HIMATSINGKA AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between E&E CO., LTD. ("E&E"), DWI HOLDINGS, INC. ("DWI"), and HIMATSINGKA AMERICA, INC. ("Himatsingka") (collectively, the "Parties") by and through their undersigned counsel, enter into this Stipulation so as to provide for the dismissal of their claims against one another without costs. THE PARTIES DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.
Case No. C-0805660 RMW

E&E dismisses with prejudice its cause of action for Unlawful Competition against
-1STIPULATION TO DISMISS [FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA EIGHTEENTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9 4111

DWI and Himatsingka. 2. E&E Co., Ltd. dismisses without prejudice its cause of action for Copyright

Infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 501 against Himatsingka. 3. 4. 5. Himatsingka is dismissed as a defendant without prejudice from this lawsuit. DWI is dismissed as a defendant with prejudice from this lawsuit. DWI and Himatsingka dismiss with prejudice their counterclaim cause of action

for Unlawful Competition against E&E. 6. DWI and Himatsingka dismiss with prejudice their counterclaim cause of action

for Tortious Interference with Business Relations against E&E. 7. against E&E. DATED: November 19, 2009 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP Himatsingka dismisses without prejudice its declaratory judgment counterclaim

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

By:

/s/ James P. Martin JAMES P. MARTIN

Attorneys for E&E CO., LTD. DATED: January 15, 2010 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By:

/s/ Edwin H. Wheeler EDWIN H. WHEELER

Attorneys for DWI HOLDINGS, INC. and HIMATSINGKA AMERICA, INC. ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

1/22/10 JUDGE RONALD M. WHYTE

Case No. C-0805660 RMW

-2STIPULATION TO DISMISS [FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41]