Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,

Filing 70

ORDER Granting 69 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of plaintiff Lenovo (United States) complaint for declaratory judgment. LENOVO HEREBY GIVES NOTICE of its voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment Relief seeking a declaration of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability of the '759 patent. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/20/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2009)

Download PDF
1 Reginald D. Steer (State Bar No. 056324) rsteer@akingump.com 2 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1500 3 San Francisco, CA 94104-1036 Telephone: (415) 765-9520 4 Facsimile: (415) 765-9501 5 Fred I. Williams (admitted pro hac vice) fwilliams@akingump.com 6 AKIN GUMP STRAUS HAUER & FELD LLP 300 West 6th Street, Suite 2100 7 Austin, TX 78701-3911 Telephone: (512) 499-6200 8 Facsimile: (512) 499-6290 9 Eric J. Klein (admitted pro hac vice) eklein@akingump.com 10 AKIN GUMP STRAUS HAUER & FELD LLP 1700 Pacific Street, Suite 4100 11 Dallas, TX 75201-4675 Telephone: (214) 969-2800 12 Facsimile: (214) 969-4343 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC., SONY ELECTRONICS 20 INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC, 21 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, AND LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 22 Plaintiffs, 23 vs. 24 WI-LAN, INC., 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 -1NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF LENOVO'S COMPLAINT UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N C O F 8/20/2009 D IS T IC T R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:08-cv-05742 JW Related To: Case No. 5:08-CV-04555 JW Case No. 5:08-CV-05543 JW Case No. 5:08-CV-05544 JW Case No. 5:08-CV-05624 JW NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.'S COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT The Honorable James Ware A LI FO m Judge Ja es Ware R NIA I ORD T IS SO ERED RT U O NO RT H 1 Plaintiff Lenovo United States, Inc. ("Lenovo") by and through its undersigned counsel, 2 hereby gives notice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) as follows: 3 WHEREAS, on December 23, 2008, Lenovo filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment 4 Relief, alleging, among other things, non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability of U.S. 5 Patent No. 6,549,759 (the '759 patent); 6 7 WHEREAS, Defendant, Wi-LAN Inc. has not answered or moved for summary judgment; WHEREAS, LENOVO is willing to voluntarily dismiss its Complaint for Declaratory 8 Judgment without prejudice; 9 LENOVO HEREBY GIVES NOTICE of its voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its 10 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment Relief seeking a declaration of non-infringement, invalidity 11 and unenforceability of the '759 patent. 12 DATED: August 17, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF LENOVO'S COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 5:08-CV-5742 JW Respectfully submitted, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Reginald D. Steer (State Bar No. 056324) Fred I. Willimas (admitted pro hac vice) Eric J. Klein (admitted pro hac vice) By /s/ Eric J. Klein Eric J. Klein AKIN GUMP STRAUS HAUER & FELD LLP 1700 Pacific Street, Suite 4100 Dallas, TX 75201-4675 Attorneys for Plaintiff LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. PURSUANT TO NOTICE, IT IS SO ORDERED. August Date: _______ 20, _, 2009 Honorable James Ware United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 mail and/or electronic mail. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on this 17th day of August, 2009, all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the Court's CM/ECF system. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class /s/Eric J. Klein Eric J. Klein -3NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF LENOVO'S COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 5:08-CV-5742 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?