Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION by Power Ventures, Inc.(a Cayman Island Corporation), Steven Vachani. (Plutzik, Alan) (Filed on 3/25/2009)

Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc.

Doc. 23

1 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP Alan R. Plutzik (State Bar No. 077785) 2 L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) 2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 3 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 -against15 POWER VENTURES, INC. d/b/a POWER.COM, a 16 California corporation; POWER VENTURES, INC. a Cayman Island Corporation, STEVE VACHANI, an 17 individual; DOE 1, d/b/a POWER.COM, an individual and/or business entity of unknown nature; DOES 2 18 through 25, inclusive, individuals and/or business entities of unknown nature, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. STIPULATION FACEBOOK, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 5:08-cv-05780 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com

1

WHEREAS counsel for plaintiff, Facebook, Inc., and defendants Power Ventures, Inc.

2 d/b/a Power.com, and Steve Vachani, have met and conferred on March 25, 2009, on the subjects 3 of initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan, as required by 4 the 12/30/08 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference And ADR Deadlines; 5 WHEREAS defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite

6 statement, was filed on March 23, 2009, and set for hearing on May 8, 2009; 7 WHEREAS the pending motion extends the time for defendants to file a responsive

8 pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4); 9 WHEREAS the parties agree that that the formulation of a discovery plan and Rule 26(f)

10 report should take into account the complaint and the responsive pleading, to properly frame the 11 issues in the case; 12 13 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The deadline to file a Rule 26(f) report, complete initial disclosures or

14 state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement should be extended to 15 30 days after a ruling on defendants' pending motion to dismiss. 16 2. The initial case management conference set for April 17, 2009 should be

17 adjourned and reset for a date approximately 45 days after a ruling on defendants' pending 18 motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for a more definite statement. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: ____________/s/_____________ David Chiappetta PERKINS COIE LLP David Chiappetta, (State Bar No. 172099) [e-mail] 101 Jefferson Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025-1114 DATED: March 25, 2009 PERKINS COIE LLP SO STIPULATED

1 2 3 DATED: March 25, 2009 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.838.4350 Attorneys for Plaintiff BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER

By: ____________/s/_____________ Alan R. Plutzik BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP Alan R. Plutzik (State Bar No. 077785) L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) 2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants

2