Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 197

Download PDF
Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 197 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kaye Scholer llp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KAYE SCHOLER LLP DAVID S. BENYACAR DANIEL L. REISNER 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022-3598 Telephone: (212) 836-8000 Facsimile: (212) 836-8689 dbenyacar@kayescholer.com dreisner@kayescholer.com Attorneys for Defendant TIME WARNER CABLE INC. GOODWIN PROCTER LLP BENJAMIN HERSHKOWITZ JOHN F. PETRSORIC 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 813-8800 Facsimile: (212) 355-3333 bhershkowitz@goodwinprocter.com jpetrsoric@goodwinprocter.com Attorneys for Defendant CSC HOLDINGS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In Re ACACIA MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C-05-01114 JW DECLARATION OF DAVID S. BENYACAR IN SUPPORT OF ROUND 3 DEFENDANTS' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE ASSERTED '863 CLAIMS AND THE PREVIOUSLY-CONSTRUED TERMS CASE NO. 05-CV-01114 JW Benyacar Declaration in Support of Round 3 Defendants' Claim Construction Memorandum Regarding the Asserted `863 Claims and the Previously Construed Terms Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kaye Scholer llp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, David S. Benyacar, hereby declare as follows: 1. I am a member of the law firm Kaye Scholer, LLP, counsel of record for defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. I make this declaration from my own personal knowledge, and if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently hereto. 2. On August 11, 2006, the Round 3 defendants will be filing their "Round 3 Defendants' Claim Construction Memorandum Regarding the Asserted `863 Claims and the PreviouslyConstrued Terms" in this courthouse. 3. The following exhibits, attached hereto, are true and correct copies of the original documents (except that previous e-filing stamps have been redacted): Exh. A: Exh. B: Exh. C: Exh. D : Exh. E: Exh. F: Exh. G: Exh. H: Exh. I: Exh. J: Exh. K: Exh. L: Exh. M: Satellite Defendants' Memorandum Regarding the Definitions of Terms in Claims 41-45 of the `992 Patent (filed May 8, 2006); pages 21-23. Round 3 Defendants' Claim Construction Brief (Part I), filed on May 8, 2006; pages 5-7, 10, 11, 55-58. Parties' Stipulated Definitions for Claim Terms From the `863 and `720 Patents (filed on July 21, 2006) Court's December 12, 2005 Markman Order, p. 17. Computer Dictionary, 2d Ed., Microsoft Press (1994); pp. 12, 48, 69, 113, 330, 336. Declaration of Peter Alexander in Support of Acacia's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, (signed October 20, 2004); 33, 34. Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 6th Ed., Telecom Library, Inc. (1993), pp. 135, 478. Declaration of S. Merrill Weiss in Support of Acacia's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (signed October 20, 2004); 83. 5/12/94 Amendment (`863 Patent Prosecution History) 12/30/94 Office Action (`863 patent prosecution history) Spohn, Darren, L., Data Network Design, McGraw Hill, Inc. (1993) Reibman, Andrew, Reliability Analysis of a Computer System for a Data Collection Application, IEEE (1990). Parties' Joint Claim Chart, p. 4., filed July 21, 2006. -1CASE NO. 05-CV-01114 JW Benyacar Declaration in Support of Round 3 Defendants' Claim Construction Memorandum Regarding the Asserted `863 Claims and the Previously Construed Terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kaye Scholer llp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Exh. N: Exh. O: June 14, 2006 Hearing Transcript, pp.39, 40, 57-61, 95. IBM Dictionary of Computing, McGraw Hill, Inc., p. 183. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 11th day of August, 2006, at New York, New York. /s/ David. S. Benyacar _____________________________ David S. Benyacar -2CASE NO. 05-CV-01114 JW Benyacar Declaration in Support of Round 3 Defendants' Claim Construction Memorandum Regarding the Asserted `863 Claims and the Previously Construed Terms

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?