Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 42

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadline for Defendant Apple Inc. to File Reply Briefs in Support of It's Motion to Strike and Motion to Dismiss by Apple, Inc.. (Counts, Thomas) (Filed on 7/7/2009)

Download PDF
Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 42 Case5:08-cv-05788-JF Document42 Filed07/07/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JONATHAN SHUB (SB# 237708) jshub@seegerweiss.com SEEGER WEISS LLP 1515 Market Street, Suite 1380 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Telephone: (215) 564-2300 Facsimile: (215) 851-8029 Attorneys for Plaintiff ARAM HOVSEPIAN DAVID M. WALSH (SB# 120761) davidwalsh@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 683-6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 THOMAS A. COUNTS (SB# 148051) tomcounts@paulhast ings.co m ERIC A. LONG (SB# 244147) ericlong@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street Twent y-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ARAM HOVSEPIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaint iff, vs. APPLE INC., Defendant. CASE NO. C 08-05788 JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF IT'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS Complaint Filed: December 31, 2008 Hon. Jeremy Fogel Case No. C 08-05788 JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR APPLE TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS Dockets.Justia.com Case5:08-cv-05788-JF Document42 Filed07/07/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, defendant Apple Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss and Motion To Strike are set to be heard by the Court on July 24, 2009; WHEREAS, Plaintiff Aram Hovsepian's Opposition to the pending Motion To Dismiss and Motion To Strike would have been due by Local Rule on July 2, 2009; WHEREAS, by agreement of the parties, Plaintiff filed his Opposition to the pending motions on Monday, July 6, 2009; WHEREAS, the Reply briefs of Apple would otherwise be due by Local Rule on Friday, July 10, 2009; WHEREAS, by agreement of the parties, Apple's Reply briefs are now due on Monday, July 13, 2009. NOW THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Apple shall file and serve its Reply briefs no later than July 13, 2009. DATED: July 7, 2009 SEEGER WEISS LLP By: /s/ Jonathan Shub JONATHAN SHUB Attorneys for Plaintiff ARAM HOVSEPIAN DATED: July 7, 2009 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP By: /s/ Thomas A. Counts THOMAS A. COUNTS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jonathan Shub for Plaintiff. By: /s/ Thomas A. Counts Thomas A. Counts Attorney for Defendant APPLE INC. LEGAL_US_W # 62195350.1 -1Case No. C 08-05788 JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR APPLE TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS Case5:08-cv-05788-JF Document42 Filed07/07/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL_US_W # 62195350.1 ORDER The Court has considered the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: Apple shall file and serve its Reply Briefs no later than July 13, 2009. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _______________ ___________________________________ Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge -2Case No. C 08-05788 JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR APPLE TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?