Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson P.C.

Filing 17

Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson P.C.

Doc. 17

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ILLINOIS COMPUTER RESEARCH LLC, Plaintiff, v. FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., Defendant. / No. C08-80074MISC JF (HRL) No. C08-80075MISC JF (HRL) ORDER (1) DENYING ILLINOIS COMPUTER RESEARCH/HARRIS MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE MOTION TO COMPEL; AND (2) RE-SETTING HEARING ON FRENKEL'S AND CISCO'S MOTIONS TO QUASH AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [Re: Docket No. 3] *E-FILED 4.17.2008*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On April 7, 2008, Illinois Computer Research LLC ("ICR") and Scott Harris filed a motion to compel discovery of third-party Richard Frenkel in connection with a lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. On that same day, Frenkel and third-party Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco") each filed motions to quash the ICR/Harris subpoena or, in the alternative, for a protective order. Presently before the court is ICR's and Harris' motion for an expedited April 22, 2008 hearing on their motion to compel. Frenkel opposes the request for shortened time. Upon consideration of the papers submitted by the parties, the court orders as follows: 1. The court does not find that an expedited hearing is necessary. Accordingly, the

ICR/Harris motion to compel remains set for hearing, as originally noticed, on May 13,

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2008, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2. 2. The court finds that it will be more efficient to hear Frenkel's and Cisco's

motions at the same time that the ICR/Harris motion is heard. Accordingly, the hearing on Frenkel's and Cisco's motions is re-set for May 13, 2008, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2. 3. Rules. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 17, 2008 HOWARD R. LLOYD Briefing on all motions shall proceed in accordance with the court's Civil Local

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5:08-mc-80074 Notice has been electronically mailed to: Karen L. Blouin [e-mail] Howard Holderness , III [e-mail], [e-mail] Mark V. Isola [e-mail] Richard B. Megley [e-mail] Raymond P. Niro [e-mail] Peter Michael Rehon [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] David J Sheikh [e-mail] Paul K Vickrey [e-mail] 5:08-mc-80075 Notice has been electronically mailed to: Karen L. Blouin [e-mail] David J. Bradford [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] Howard Holderness , III [e-mail], [e-mail] Richard B. Megley [e-mail] Raymond P. Niro [e-mail] Eric A. Sacks [e-mail] Terrence Joseph Truax [e-mail] Paul K Vickrey [e-mail] Daniel J. Weiss [e-mail] Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3