Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al

Filing 1029

Download PDF
Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al Doc. 1029 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 610 16 T H STREET - SUITE 310 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 TEL: (510) 763-1900 FAX: (510) 763-5952 MICHAEL W. FOSTER (SBN 127691) DAVID J. CARDIFF (SBN 184246) FOSTER AND ASSOCIATES 610 16TH STREET, SUITE 310 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 TELEPHONE: (510) 763-1900 FACSIMILE: (510) 763-5952 mfoster@fosterlaborlaw.com dcardiff@fosterlaborlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. v. MYRA C. CRENSHAW, Plaintiff, SSOCIATES Case No. C 05-02387 RMW Trial Date: January 22, 2007 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER DATE: February 10, 2006 TIME: 10:30 a.m. DEPT: 6 F OSTER &A The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte The parties appeared for their scheduled Case Management Conference ("CMC") on February 10, 2006. Plaintiff Myra Crenshaw appeared in propria persona. David Cardiff, Esq., of Foster & Associates, appeared on behalf of Defendant Sun Microsystems, Inc. At the CMC the Court issued this ORDER establishing the following trial and pre-trial schedules and directions in this case: June 30, 2006: September 8, 2006: September 9, 2006: September 22, 2006: October 13, 2006: Non-expert discovery cut-off Last day to hear dispositive motions Expert witness designation cut-off Rebuttal expert witness designation cut-off Expert deposition cut-off 1 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 610 16 T H STREET - SUITE 310 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 TEL: (510) 763-1900 FAX: (510) 763-5952 January 5, 2007: January 11, 2007: January 22, 2007: Joint Pre-Trial Statement Pre-Trial Conference, 2:00 p.m. Trial The Magistrate assigned to this case is Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. The parties shall meet and confer in advance of the trial date in a timely manner so as to provide ample time to schedule a Settlement Conference with the Magistrate. This case is assigned to Early Neutral Evaluation ("ENE"). The parties shall meet and confer to coordinate a date for the ENE. The following limitations on discovery shall apply: 10 Requests for Admissions per party 25 Interrogatories per party 10 Depositions per party There shall be no numeric limit on the number of document production requests that parties may serve, but such requests shall be narrowly tailored. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: OSTER &A SSOCIATES _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE F 2 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?