Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 127

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 85 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2010)

Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Doc. 127

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64037 Email: [e-mail] JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 Email: [e-mail] STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 Email: [e-mail] ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) Email: [e-mail] ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 Email: [e-mail] WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and PATRICK R. BROGAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS AND PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PERTAINING TO FORTINET, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT REGARDING THE `125 AND `311 PATENTS

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.'s administrative motion to file under seal portions of Fortinet's Opposition to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s ("PAN") Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Regarding the `125 and `311 Patents ("Opposition"), the Declaration of Dr. Matthew A. Bishop in Support of Fortinet's Opposition and exhibits thereto ("Bishop Declaration"), and Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Stefani E. Shanberg in Support of Fortinet's Opposition ("Confidential Exhibit") pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Bishop Declaration, Confidential Exhibit, and the following portions of Fortinet's Opposition are filed under seal: a) TOC i.13-22; b) 1:8-14 (following "Motion at 7 (emphasis in original) . . ." through ". . . Beyond the overwhelming evidence"); c) 9:6-12:2; d) 12:7-8; e) 12:12-13:4; f) 13:14-16:1; g) 16:3-16; h) 18:14-21 (following "PAN's supplemental production. Id. paragraph 19. . ." through ". . . Details regarding further discovery"); i) 19:14-28 (following "Contrary to PAN's representations . . ." through ". . . For the foregoing reasons"; including the footnote); and j) 20:27-28 IT IS SO ORDERED

June

30,

2010

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

-1-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Presented by: WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC.

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

-2-